Kislov R. Engaging with theory: from theoretically informed to theoretically informative improvement research. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(3):177–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Damschroder LJ. Clarity out of chaos: use of theory in implementation research. Psychiatry Res. 2019. Published online before print.
Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10(53).
Colquhoun HL, Brehaut JC, Sales A, Ivers N, Grimshaw J, Michie S, Carroll K, Chalifoux M, Eva KW. A systematic review of the use of theory in randomized controlled trials of audit and feedback. Implement Sci. 2013;8(66).
Davies P, Walker AE, Grimshaw JM. A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implement Sci. 2010:5(14).
Birken SA, Powell BJ, Presseau J, Kirk MA, Lorencatto F, Gould NJ, Shea CM, Weiner BJ, Francis JJ, Yu Y, et al. Combined use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF): a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2017;12(2).
Wensing M, Grol R. Knowledge translation in health: how implementation science could contribute more. BMC Med. 2019;17(88).
Powell BJ, Fernandez ME, Williams NJ, Aarons GA, Beidas RS, Lewis CC, McHugh SM, Weiner BJ: Enhancing the impact of implementation strategies in healthcare: a research agenda. Front Public Health. 2019;7(3).
May CR, Johnson M, Finch T. Implementation, context and complexity. Implement Sci. 2016;11(141).
Sales AE, Wilson PM, Wensing M, Aarons GA, Armstrong R, Flottorp S, Hutchinson AM, Presseau J, Rogers A, Sevdalis N. Implementation Science and Implementation Science Communications: our aims, scope, and reporting expectations. Implement Sci. 2019;14(77).
Weick KE. Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Acad Manage Rev. 1989;14(4):516–31.
Article
Google Scholar
Corley KG, Gioia DA. Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad Manage Rev. 2011;36(1):12–32.
Article
Google Scholar
Rycroft-Malone J, Burton CR, Wilkinson J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Baker R, Dopson S, Graham ID, Staniszewska S, Thompson C, et al. Collective action for implementation: a realist evaluation of organisational collaboration in healthcare. Implement Sci. 2016;11(17).
May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43(3):535–54.
Article
Google Scholar
Harvey G, Kitson A. PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implement Sci. 2016;11(33).
Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC: Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009, 4(50).
Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, Michie S. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24:228–38.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Harvey G, Fitzgerald L, Fielden S, McBride A, Waterman H, Bamford D, Kislov R, Boaden R. The NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) for Greater Manchester: combining empirical, theoretical and experiential evidence to design and evaluate a large-scale implementation strategy. Implement Sci. 2011;6(96).
Stetler CB, Mittman BS, Francis J. Overview of the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) and QUERI theme articles: QUERI series. Implement Sci. 2008;3(8).
The Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG): Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implement Sci 2006, 1(4).
Merton RK. Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press; 1968.
Google Scholar
Llewelyn S. What counts as “theory” in qualitative management and accounting research? Introducing five levels of theorizing. Account Audit Accountab J. 2003;16(4):662–708.
Article
Google Scholar
Pinder CC, Moore LF. The resurrection of taxonomy to aid the development of middle range theories of organizational behavior. In: Middle range theory and the study of organizations. Springer; 1980. p. 187-211.
Brodie RJ, Saren M, Pels J. Theorizing about the service dominant logic: the bridging role of middle range theory. Marketing Theory. 2011;11(1):75–91.
Article
Google Scholar
Swedberg R. Before theory comes theorizing or how to make social science more interesting. The British Journal of Sociology. 2016;67(1):5–22.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bourgeois LJ III. Toward a method of middle-range theorizing. Acad Manage Rev. 1979;4(3):443–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Weick KE. What theory is not, theorizing is. Adm Sci Q. 1995;40(3):385–90.
Article
Google Scholar
Liang L, Bernhardsson S, Vernooij RW, Armstrong MJ, Bussières A, Brouwers MC, Gagliardi AR. Use of theory to plan or evaluate guideline implementation among physicians: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2017;12(26).
May CR, Cummings A, Girling M, Bracher M, Mair FS, May CM, Murray E, Myall M, Rapley T, Finch T: Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2018;13(80).
Van Belle S, van de Pas R, Marchal B. Towards an agenda for implementation science in global health: there is nothing more practical than good (social science) theories. BMJ Global Health. 2017;2(e000181).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ashworth RE, McDermott AM, Currie G. Theorizing from qualitative research in public administration: plurality through a combination of rigor and richness. J Public Admin Res Theory. 2019:318–33.
Article
Google Scholar
Jamal F, Fletcher A, Shackleton N, Elbourne D, Viner R, Bonell C. The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: a theoretical and methodological case-example. Trials. 2015;16(466).
Bonell C, Fletcher A, Morton M, Lorenc T, Moore L. Realist randomised controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(12):2299–306.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tsoukas H: Craving for generality and small-N studies: a Wittgensteinian approach towards the epistemology of the particular in organization and management studies. In: SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods. Edited by Buchanan D, Bryman A. London: SAGE Publications; 2009. p. 285-301.
Whetten DA. What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad Manage Rev. 1989;14(4):490–5.
Article
Google Scholar
Lewis J, Ritchie J. Generalising from qualitative research. In: Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Edited by Ritchie J, Lewis J. London: Sage Publications; 2003.
Tourish D: Performativity, metatheorising and journal rankings: what are the implications for emerging journals and academic freedom? In: Redesigning Management Education Research: Challenging Proposals from European Scholars. Edited by Dameron S, Durand T. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2011. p. 183-198.
Suddaby R. Editor’s comments: why theory? Acad Manage Rev. 2014;39(4):407–11.
Article
Google Scholar
Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(4):1758–72.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Davidoff F. Understanding contexts: how explanatory theories can help. Implement Sci. 2019;14(23).
Lewis CC, Klasnja P, Powell BJ, Lyon AR, Tuzzio L, Jones S, Walsh-Bailey C, Weiner B: From classification to causality: advancing understanding of mechanisms of change in implementation science. Front Public Health. 2018;6(136).
Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Theorising interventions as events in systems. Am J Community Psychol. 2009;43(3-4):267-76.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hedström P, Ylikoski P. Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Ann Rev Sociol. 2010;36:49–67.
Article
Google Scholar
Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Complex interventions: how “out of control” can a randomised controlled trial be? BMJ. 2004;328(7455):1561–3.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Harvey G, McCormack B, Kitson A, Lynch E, Titchen A: Designing and implementing two facilitation interventions within the ‘Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE)’study: a qualitative analysis from an external facilitators’ perspective. Implement Sci. 2018;13(141).
Kislov R, Humphreys J, Harvey G. How do managerial techniques evolve over time? The distortion of “facilitation” in healthcare service improvement. Publ Manag Rev. 2017;19(8):1165–83.
Article
Google Scholar
Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group. https://epoc.cochrane.org/.
Nilsen P, Ståhl C, Roback K, Cairney P. Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research. Implement Sci. 2013;8(63).
Foy R, Ovretveit J, Shekelle PG, Pronovost PJ, Taylor SL, Dy S, Hempel S, McDonald KM, Rubenstein LV, Wachter RM. The role of theory in research to develop and evaluate the implementation of patient safety practices. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(5):453–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2002.
Google Scholar
Johnson P, Buehring A, Cassell C, Symon G. Evaluating qualitative management research: towards a contingent criteriology. Int J Manag Rev. 2006;8(3):131–56.
Article
Google Scholar
Cornelissen JP. Preserving theoretical divergence in management research: why the explanatory potential of qualitative research should be harnessed rather than suppressed. J Manag Stud. 2017;54(3):368–83.
Article
Google Scholar
Kislov R, Hyde P, McDonald R. New game, old rules? Mechanisms and consequences of legitimation in boundary spanning activities. Organ Stud. 2017;38(10):1421–44.
Article
Google Scholar
Sayer A. Method in social science: a realist approach, Revised 2nd edn. Oxon: Routledge; 2010.
Book
Google Scholar
Porter S, McConnell T, Reid J. The possibility of critical realist randomised controlled trials. Trials. 2017;18(133).
Marchal B, Westhorp G, Wong G, Van Belle S, Greenhalgh T, Kegels G, Pawson R. Realist RCTs of complex interventions–an oxymoron. Soc Sci Med. 2013;94:124–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Abend G. The meaning of ‘theory’. Sociol Theory. 2008;26(2):173–99.
Article
Google Scholar