Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Erratum to: ‘Evaluation of quality improvement for cesarean sections programmes through mixed methods’

  • Clara Bermúdez-Tamayo1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Mira Johri4, 5,
  • Francisco Jose Perez-Ramos6,
  • Gracia Maroto-Navarro2, 3,
  • Africa Caño-Aguilar7,
  • Leticia Garcia-Mochon2,
  • Longinos Aceituno8,
  • François Audibert9, 10 and
  • Nils Chaillet11
Implementation Science201611:37

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0402-x

Received: 11 March 2016

Accepted: 11 March 2016

Published: 16 March 2016

The original article was published in Implementation Science 2014 9:182

Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] contained an error. The acknowledgements was included incorrectly. The correct acknowledgements can be found below.

The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding of this research provided by the Ministry of Health and Consumers’ Affairs - –Spain (FIS Exp. PI13/01340 and FEDER funds) and the CHIR- Quebec Training Network in Perinatal Research (QTNPR). The study funders had no role in the study design, data analysis, data collection, data interpretation or the writing of the report. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily of the funding bodies.

Notes

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
(2)
Andalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain
(3)
CIBERESP, Ciber de Epidemiologia y Salud Publica, València, Spain
(4)
Division of Global Health, University of Montreal, Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
(5)
Department of Health Administration, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
(6)
General Secretary of Quality iInnovation and Public Health, Consejería de Igualdad, Salud y Políticas Sociales, Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla, Spain
(7)
UGC Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain
(8)
UGC Gynaecology, Hospital La Inmaculada, Huercal-Overa, Spain
(9)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
(10)
Sainte Justine Hospital, 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, Canada
(11)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada

Reference

  1. Bermúdez-Tamayo C, Johri M, Perez-Ramos FJ, Maroto-Navarro G, Caño-Aguilar A, Garcia-Mochon L, et al. Evaluation of quality improvement for cesarean sections programmes through mixed methods. Implement Sci. 2014;9:182.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bermúdez-Tamayo et al. 2016

Advertisement