Skip to main content

Table 2 Propositions used to further refine the explanatory model

From: Implementation of safety checklists in surgery: a realist synthesis of evidence

Proposition

Mechanism of implementation

Coherence with middle-range theory (supporting data from review studies)

Checklist protocols that are prospectively tailored to the context are more likely to be used and sustained in practice.

Process simplification

Normalisation Process Theory

 • Keeping it simple

 • Modifying to reflect workflow

 • Tailoring to context

Reflection

 • Collective learning

 • Monitoring

 • Feeding back

Fidelity and sustainability is increased when checklist protocols can be seamlessly integrated into daily professional practice.

Process simplification

Normalisation Process Theory

 • Keeping it simple

Responsive Regulation Theory

 • Modifying to reflect workflow

 • Tailoring to context

Reflection

 • Collective learning

 • Monitoring

 • Feeding back

Routine embedding of checklist protocols in practice is influenced by factors that promote or inhibit clinicians’ participation.

Active leadership

Responsive Regulation Theory

 • Discipline leader

Normalisation Process Theory

 • Frontline decision-making

 • Active participation

Support strategies

 • Controlled roll-out

 • Support without sanction

 • Communicating the message

Process simplification

 • Keeping it simple

 • Modifying to reflect workflow

 • Tailoring to context

Reflection

 • Collective learning

 • Monitoring

 • Feeding back

Regulation reinforcement mechanisms that are more contextually responsive should lead to greater compliance with using checklist protocols.

Active leadership

Responsive Regulation Theory

 • Discipline leader

 • Frontline decision-making

 • Active participation

Support strategies

 • Controlled roll-out

 • Support without sanction

 • Communicating the message