Skip to main content

Table 3 Qualitatively summarized results, overall rating, and quality of evidence (GRADE) on internal consistency per instrument

From: Instruments measuring evidence-based practice behavior, attitudes, and self-efficacy among healthcare professionals: a systematic review of measurement properties

Instrument (reference)

Summarized result on internal consistency (overall rating)

Rating

Quality of evidence

Quality level

Reason

EBPAS [36,37,38,39, 41,42,43,44, 97, 99]

Cronbach’s alpha range per subscale: 1. Requirements 0.88–0.94, 2. Appeal 0.72–0.80, 3. Openness 0.73–0.84, 4. Divergence 0.51–0.85

1–3: ( +)

4: ( −)

Moderate

Moderate

 − 1 struc val

 − 1 struc val

EBPAS-50 [45, 46]

Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.77 to 0.92 on the eight new subscales

( +)

Low

 − 2 struc val

EBPAS-36 [47, 100]

Cronbach’s alphas range per subscale: 1. Appeal, Fit, Balance and Divergence = 0.61–0.69, 0.62–0.68, 0.64–0.65, and 0.66–0.68. 2. All other subscales > 0.70. Indeterminate rating (?) since criteria for sufficient structural validity not met

(?)

No grade

 

EBPQ [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55, 101]

Cronbach’s alpha range per subscale: 1. Attitudes: 0.68–0.83, 2. Practice: 0.74–0.93, 3. Knowledge/skills: 0.90–0.96

1: ( +)

2,3: ( +)

Low

Moderate

 − 1 struc val, − 1 incon

 − 1 struc val

EBP Beliefs [56,57,58,59,60]

Disagreement about dimensionality between give studies. Results are summarized in subgroups (unidimensional/multifactorial)

1. Unidimensional (single factor): Cronbach’s alpha range = 0.86–0.90

2. Multifactorial (four factors): Indeterminate rating (?) since criteria for sufficient structural validity not met

1: ( +)

2: (?)

Moderate

No grade

 − 1 struc val

EBP Beliefs- Short [102]

Cronbach’s alpha on scale = 0.89

( +)

Low

 − 2 Struc val

EBP Implement [56, 58, 60, 61]

Disagreement about dimensionality between four studies. Results are summarized in subgroups (unidimensional/multifactorial)

1. Unidimensional (single factor): Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96

2. Multifactorial (four/five/two factors): Indeterminate rating (?) since criteria for sufficient structural validity not met

1: ( +)

2: (?)

Low

No grade

 − 2 struc val

EBP Implement- Short [102]

Cronbach’s alpha on scale = 0.81

( +)

Low

 − 2 Struc val

Ethiopian EBP Implement [111]

Cronbach’s alpha not reported for each subscale. total scale = 0.83

(?)

No grade

 

Al Zoubi Questionnaire [62]

Person separation index per subscale: Attitudes = 0.63, Self-efficacy = 0.80, Knowledge = 0.81, Resources = 0.86. Indeterminate rating (?) since criteria for sufficient structural validity not met

(?)

No grade

 

EBPP-S [63]

Cronbach’s alpha per subscale: 1. Attitudes = 0.89, 2. Knowledge = 0.90, 3. Behavior = 0.83

1–3 = ( +)

Low

 − 2 struc val

EBP inventory [66, 67]

Cronbach’s alpha range per subscale: 1. Decision making = 0.60–0.64,

2. All other subscales > 0.70. Indeterminate rating (?) since criteria for sufficient structural validity not met

(?)

No grade

 

EPIC [69]

Cronbach’s alpha on scale: 0.89

( +)

Low

 − 1 Struc val, − 1 RoB

MPAS [71, 72]

Cronbach’s alpha range per sample: 1. USA = 0.78–0.80, 2. Korea: 0.65

1: ( +)

2: ( −)

High

Low

 − 1 RoB

EBPPAS [73, 74]

Cronbach’s alpha range per subscale: Familiarity = 0.91–0.92, Attitudes = 0.83–0.90, Feasibility = 0.57–0.63, Intentions = 0.80–0.86, Currently engaged = 0.86–0.87. Indeterminate rating (?) since criteria for sufficient structural validity not met

(?)

No grade

 

EBPPAS-s [75]

Cronbach’s alpha per subscale: Familiarity = 0.93, Attitudes = 0.92, Feasibility = 0.74, Currently engaged = 0.91. Indeterminate rating (?) since criteria for sufficient structural validity not met

(?)

No grade

 

SE-EBP [76, 77]

Cronbach’s alpha range per subscale: identifying the clinical problem = 0.89–0.91, searching for evidence = 0.90–0.96, implementing evidence into practice = 0.93–0.96. Indeterminate rating (?) since criteria for sufficient structural validity not met

(?)

No grade

 

EBPSE [78]

Cronbach’s alpha = 0.95. Indeterminate rating (?) since no evidence of unidimensionality

(?)

No grade

 

EBP Capability

Beliefs [79]

Person separation index = 0.92. Indeterminate rating (?) since no evidence of unidimensionality

(?)

No grade

 

HEAT [80]

Cronbach’s alpha per subscale: EBP frequency = 0.82, EBP ability = 0.89, EBP desire = 0.92, EBP barriers = 0.80

( +)

High

 

EBP-KABQ [81]

Cronbach’s alpha per subscale: Knowledge = 0.66, Attitude = 0.75, Behavior = 0.77, Outcome = 0.83. Indeterminate rating (?) since criteria for sufficient structural validity not met

(?)

No grade

 

Quick EBP-VIK [83, 84]

Cronbach’s alpha range per subscale: 1. Value = 0.78–0.89, 2. Knowledge = 0.92–0.93, 3. Implement = 0.66–0.91

1–2: ( +)

3: ( ±)

Moderate

No grade

 − 2: Struc val

HS-EBP [86]

Cronbach’s alpha per subscale: Beliefs and attitudes = 0.93, Results from scientific research = 0.96, Development of professional practice = 0.84, Assessment of results = 0.94, Barriers or Facilitators = 0.91

( +)

High

 

EBPRS [88]

Cronbach’s alpha per subscale: Informational needs: 0.85, EBP knowledge: 0.78, EBP attitude: 0.87, Workplace culture: 0.84

( +)

High

 

EBP2 [89,90,91,92, 104]

Cronbach’s alpha range per subscale (five-factor model): Relevance: 0.91–0.94, Sympathy: 0.66–0.80, Terminology: 0.94–0.98, Practice: 0.85–0.923, Confidence: 0.93–0.94. Indeterminate (?) rating since criteria for sufficient structural validity not met

(?)

No grade

 

ISP-D [94]

Cronbach’s alpha per subscale (four-factor model): 1. Attitudes = 0.75, 2. Subjective norms = 0.72, 3. Perceived behavioral control = 0.63, 4. Behavioral intention = 0.84

1, 2, 4: ( +)

3: ( −)

1, 2, 4: High

3: High

 

EBNAQ [95]

Cronbach’s alpha per subscale (three-factor model): 1. Beliefs and expectations = 0.86, 2. Intention of conduct = 0.63, 3. Feelings toward the EBN = 0.70

1, 3: ( +)

2: ( −)

Moderate

Moderate

 − 1 struc val

 − 1 struc val

EBP-COQ Prof [105, 106]

Cronbach’s alpha per subscale: 1. Attitude toward EBP = 0.888, 2. EBP knowledge = 0.948, 3. EBP skills = 0.817, 4. EBP utilization = 0.840

(?)

No grade

 

I-SABE [108]

Cronbach’s alpha per subscale: 1. EBP self-efficacy = 0.76, 2. Behavior = 0.30, 3. Attitudes = 0.64, 4. Results = 0.84. Indeterminate (?) rating since criteria for sufficient structural validity not met

(?)

No grade

 

Noor EBM [109]

Cronbach’s alpha on total scales (not per subscale):

1.Attitude scale = 0.81, 2. Practice scale = 0.84. Indeterminate (?) rating since criteria for sufficient structural validity not met

(?)

No grade

 

EBP-CBFRI [110]

Cronbach’s alpha range on subscales = 0.92–0.95

( +)

High

 
  1. Overall rating of results: ( +) = sufficient result; ( −) = insufficient result; (?) = indeterminate result; ( ±) = inconsistent results
  2. Quality of evidence: modified GRADE approach [28, 31]. Quality levels: high, moderate, low, and very low
  3. Reasons for downgrade: risk of bias = “RoB”, Inconsistency = “Incon”, imprecision = “Impre”, indirectness = “Indir”
  4. α = Cronbach’s alpha