Skip to main content

Table 1 Summarized results on quality assessment, rating, and quality of evidence on the development and content validity per instrument

From: Instruments measuring evidence-based practice behavior, attitudes, and self-efficacy among healthcare professionals: a systematic review of measurement properties

 

Development

Content validity (COSMIN box 1 and 2)

 

Concept elicitation (COSMIN box 1a)

Relevance

Comprehensiveness

Comprehensibility

Instrument (ref)

COSMIN Quality rating

Sample involved?

Rating of results

Quality of evidence

Rating of results

Quality of evidence

Rating of results

Quality of evidence

EBPAS [36, 41, 97,98,99]

Doubtful

Yes

( +)

Very low*

(–)

Very Low*

( +)

Moderate (rob)

EBPAS-50 [45]

Doubtful

Yes

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

EBPAS-36 [47, 100]

Doubtful

Yes

( +)

Low (rob)

(–)

Very low *

( +)

Moderate (rob)

EBPQ [48, 49, 51, 52, 54, 101]

Doubtful

Yes

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Low (incon + rob)

EBP Beliefs [56, 58, 59, 99]

Inadequate

No

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Moderate (rob)

EBP Beliefs-Short [102]

Inadequate

No

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

EBP Implement [56, 58]

Inadequate

No

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Moderate (rob)

EBP Implement-Short [102]

Inadequate

No

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

Ethiopian EBP Implement [111]

Inadequate

No

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Low (rob × 2)

Al Zoubi Questionnaire [62]

Doubtful

Yes

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

EBPP-S [63]

Inadequate

No

( ±)

Very low *

(–)

Very low *

--

--

Jette [64, 103]

Inadequate

No

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Moderate (rob)

( +)

Moderate (rob)

Bernhardsson [65]

Inadequate

No

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Low (rob × 2)

( +)

Low (rob × 2)

EBP inventory [66, 67]

Doubtful

Yes

( +)

Low (rob × 2)

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Moderate

(rob)

EPIC [68]

Doubtful

No

( +)

Low (rob × 2)

( +)

Low (rob × 2)

( +)

Low (rob × 2)

MPAS [71]

Inadequate

No

( +)

Very low *

(–)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

EBPPAS [73]

Inadequate

No

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

SE-EBP [76]

Doubtful

Yes

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

EBPSE [78]

Doubtful

Yes

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

EBP Capability Beliefs [79]

Inadequate

No

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

HEAT [80]

Doubtful

Yes

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

EBP-KABQ [81]

Doubtful

No

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

Quick EBP-VIK [82, 84]

Doubtful

No

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Moderate (rob)

HS-EBP [85]

Adequate

Yes

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

EBPRS [87, 88]

Inadequate

No

( ±)

Very low *

(-)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

EBP2 [89, 90, 92]

Doubtful

No

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Moderate (rob)

ISP-D [93]

Adequate

Yes

( +)

Low (rob × 2)

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Low (rob × 2)

EBNAQ [95]

Doubtful

Yes

( +)

Low (rob × 2)

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Low (rob × 2)

Diermayr [96]

Doubtful

Yes

( +)

Very low *

(-)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

EBP-COQ Prof [105, 106]

Doubtful

Yes

( +)

Low (rob × 2)

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Moderate (rob)

EIDM competence measure [107]

Adequate

Yes

( +)

Moderate (rob)

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Moderate (rob)

I-SABE [108]

Doubtful

Yes

( +)

Low (rob × 2)

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Low (rob × 2)

Noor EBM [109]

Doubtful

Yes

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Low (rob × 2)

EBP-CBFRI [110]

Doubtful

No

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

( +)

Very low *

  1. Overall rating of results: ( +) = sufficient; ( −) = insufficient; (?) = indeterminate; ( ±) = inconsistent
  2. Quality assessment: VG = very good; A = adequate; D = doubtful; I = inadequate
  3. Quality of evidence: Modified GRADE approach [28, 31]. Quality levels: high, moderate, low, and very low
  4. Reasons for downgrade: risk of bias = “RoB”, Inconsistency = “Incon”, Imprecision = “Impre”, Indirectness = “Indir”
  5. “--”: No grade due to lack of questionnaire access
  6. *When based only on reviewer’s rating, i.e., not enough evidence from or inadequate quality of development study and not enough evidence from or inadequate quality of content validity study