Distinct SAIA-MH Implementation Strategy coded to ERIC | Individual, organizational, or contextual barrier(s) addressed |
---|---|
External facilitation | Lack of knowledge of quality improvement and SAIA-MH implementation strategy |
Provide ongoing clinical consultation | Clinical knowledge gaps; gaps in clinical evaluation and reporting |
Organize service provider implementation team meetings | Limited teamwork: lower-level providers afraid to innovate without approval; siloing of services and providers; issues with role clarity |
Step 1: Cascade analysis (ERIC: Audit and feedback; Model and simulate change; facilitate relay of clinical data to providers) | Lack of knowledge of problems; no data for prioritization; data only collected/reported but limited feedback; limited accountability |
Step 2: Process mapping (ERIC: Conduct local needs assessment; assess readiness for change and identify barriers/facilitators; conduct local consensus discussions) | Lack of consensus on current system; limited teamwork; limited discussion on full system, goals, barriers, and facilitators; hard to conceptualize potential modifications |
Steps 3–5: Conduct cyclical tests of change (ERIC: Conduct cyclical small tests of change; tailor strategies; develop a formal implementation blueprint; purposely reexamine the implementation) | Limited culture of quality; providers rigidly follow guidelines with no ability to innovate and improve |