Skip to main content

Table 9 Sensitivity analysis of comparative effectiveness—participants filling in the survey at all measurement points (N = 401)

From: Effectiveness of a multifaceted implementation strategy for improving adherence to the guideline for prevention of mental ill-health among school personnel in Sweden: a cluster randomized trial

Guideline adherence indicators

Intervention effect 6 monthsa, (group 1 vs. group 2) AORb, (CI)

p value

Intervention effect 12 monthsa, (group 1 vs. group 2) AORb, (CI)

p value

1a

2.09 (.894–4.890)

.089

2.43 (1.035–5.711)

.041

1b

1.39 (.610–3.148)

.436

1.63 (.714–3.702)

.246

2a

2.21 (.972–5.021)

.059

1.16 (.499–2.694)

.730

3a

.75 (.283–1.967)

.553

.61 (.233–1.577)

.304

3b

.85 (.315–2.301)

.751

.41 (.150–1.124)

.083

3c

2.15 (.651–7.074)

.210

1.30 (.386–4.345)

.675

3d

1.51 (.413–5.483)

.535

.858 (.218–3.377)

.826

3e

1.41 (.320–6.191)

.650

.682 (.120–3.864)

.665

  1. aIn relation to baseline adherence
  2. bAdjusted odds ratios for the length of work experience in the school and school organizational change