Skip to main content

Table 1 Four steps and associated guiding questions to explore prior to implementation of interventions that can improve health equity throughout early phases of implementation science activities

From: Addressing health disparities through implementation science—a need to integrate an equity lens from the outset

Pre-implementation steps to promote equity in implementation research

Guiding questions for consideration

Identify important stakeholders related to equity and establish roles for partners throughout the implementation process

• Who are the key stakeholders for health problems among vulnerable populations in your setting/context?

• What are stakeholders’, including vulnerable persons and community members, preferences for how to be involved throughout different phases of the implementation process?

• Can choices be provided for different approaches to and opportunities for involvement across different implementation phases?

• Have ways to ensure that stakeholders are appropriately compensated for their time been considered?

• What are the priorities of stakeholders that align with or are at odds with implementation, and how can they be leveraged/addressed?

• Has a plan been outlined with and agreed to by community members and other stakeholders about engagement processes across the implementation stages, including dissemination strategies?

Include equity-related considerations when deciding which intervention(s) to implement and/or de-implement

• Is the health problem you are interested in targeting a priority to vulnerable populations in your setting/context?

• Does the intervention(s) being considered have strong potential to improve that health problem for vulnerable populations in your setting/context?

• Is there an existing intervention related to that health problem that provides low-value to vulnerable populations in your setting/context that should be de-implemented?

• Who are trusted messengers and sources for vulnerable populations in your setting/context?

Evaluate the performance gap related to the intervention or program of interest in vulnerable populations

• What is the performance gap for an intervention in vulnerable populations in your setting/context?

• What is the outcome gap for an intervention in vulnerable populations in your setting/context?

• Do the performance and outcome gaps differ across populations and settings?

Identify and prioritize barriers faced by vulnerable populations—including structural racism and power dynamics

• Have the individual-, health systems-, and community-level barriers that explain the performance gap among vulnerable populations in your setting/context been explored?

• Have the social determinants of health among vulnerable populations in your setting/context (including historical and structural racism and power dynamics) been discussed with stakeholders to understand their importance and potential impact on the health problem, intervention and implementation strategies being considered?

• What implementation strategies may overcome key barriers—including social determinants of health—and optimize reach among vulnerable populations in your setting/context?

• Are outcomes that are important and meaningful to stakeholders, including vulnerable populations, known, and included in the evaluation plan?

• What evaluation measures will allow you to ensure that your implementation strategies are improving (not worsening) health disparities among vulnerable populations in your setting/context?