Skip to main content

Table 4 Factors that effectively enhanced implementation outcomes

From: A systematic review of evidence-based practice implementation in drug and alcohol settings: applying the consolidated framework for implementation research framework

 

Baer et al. 2009 [39]

Carpenter et al. 2012 [42]

Carroll et al. 2006

Decker and Martino 2013 [43]

Garner et al. 2012 [45]

Gaume et al. 2014 [46]

Helseth et al. 2018 [47]

Johnson et al. 2002 [50]

Larson et al. 2013 [54]

Liddle et al. 2010 [55]

Martino et al. 2008 [59]

Martino et al. 2011 [60]

Martino et al. 2016 [61]

Meier et al., 2015 [62]

Miller et al., 2004 [65]

Morgenstern et al. 2001 [66]

Rawson et al. 2013 [67]

Smith et al. 2012 [68]

Weingardt et al. 2006 [69]

Weingardt et al. 2009 [70]

PERCENTAGE of studies with outcomes

Outcomes Obtained

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

 

x

x

x

 

x

x

x

x

 

x

x

 

Fidelity Outcomes

x

x

x

x

x

x

 

x

 

x

x

x

 

x

x

x

x

   

82%

Knowledge Outcomes

                

x

 

x

x

18%

Adoption Outcomes

      

x

             

6%

Clinical Outcomes

  

x

 

x

x

 

x

 

x

x

x

 

x

      

47%

Discrete Strategies

 

x

 

x

x

  

x

 

x

x

x

    

x

 

x

x

59%

 Local experts

   

x

  

x

   

x

         

18%

 Financial incentives

    

x

               

6%

 Booster sessions

       

x

            

6%

 Web-based training

                  

x

x

12%

 Teleconferencing

 

x

              

x

   

12%

 Context based

x

        

x

 

x

        

18%

 Workshop alone

     

x

              

6%

Multi-modal approaches

  

x

x

  

x

   

x

  

x

x

x

    

41%

Clinician Characteristics

x

x

 

x

 

x

x

x

     

x

x

     

47%

Demographics

x

x

   

x

x

      

x

      

35%

 Education

x

x

           

x

      

18%

 Gender

     

x

x

      

x

      

18%

Beliefs and Attitudes

x

  

x

 

x

x

             

24%

 Disease beliefs

x

                   

6%

 Confidence

   

x

                

6%

 Self-efficacy

     

x

              

6%

 Intervention efficacy

     

x

              

6%

 Intervention Compatibility

      

x

             

6%

Learning

 

x

     

x

            

12%

 Vocabulary

 

x

                  

6%

 Verbal abstract reasoning

 

x

                  

6%

 Affective learning

       

x

            

6%

Organisational Level Factors

x

                   

6%

Encouraging innovations

x

                   

6%

Organisational self-efficacy

x

                   

6%

  1. x = factor significantly related to implementation outcomes. Factors listed here were not measured by all included studies. Percentages refer to the percentage of studies that obtained findings related to a particular factor across studies that achieved implementation outcomes
Back to article page

Implementation Science

ISSN: 1748-5908