Skip to main content

Table 4 Intervention effects calculated from meta-analysis and network meta-analysis, ordered by effect size (intervention v control)

From: How effective are social norms interventions in changing the clinical behaviours of healthcare workers? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Type of social norms intervention

Number of comparisons for meta-analysis (network meta-analysis)

SMD meta-analysis (95%CI)

n = 100

SMD network meta-analysis (95%CI)

n = 102

Probability of being the best intervention (%)

Social comparison + social reward

2

0.39(0.15 to 0.64)

0.39 (0.15 to 0.64)

59.2

Social comparison + prompts/cues

5

0.33(0.22 to 0.24)

0.33 (0.22 to 0.44)

22.2

Credible sourcea

7

0.30(0.13 to 0.47)

0.30 (0.13 to 0.47)

18.6

Social comparison + credible sourcea

8(10)

0.16(0.12 to 0.19)

0.16(0.12 to 0.20)

0.0

Social comparison + social support (unspecified)

7

0.10(0.04 to 0.16)

0.10 (0.04 to 0.16)

0.0

Other multiple social norms BCTs

4

0.07(0.03 to 0.12)

0.07(0.03 to 0.12)

0.0

Social comparison

33(35)

0.05(0.03 to 0.08)

0.05(0.03 to 0.08)

0.0

Social comparison + other BCTs

23

0.04(0.00 to 0.08)

0.04(0.00 to 0.08)

0.0

Social reward

2

0.03(− 0.08 to 0.13)

0.03(− 0.08 to 0.13)

0.0

Social comparison + instructions on how to perform the behaviour + prompts/cues

5

0.01(− 0.10 to 0.11)

0.01(− 0.10 to 0.11)

0.0

Social comparison + info on health consequences

4

− 0.14(− 0.33 to 0.05)

− 0.14(− 0.33 to 0.05)

0.0

  1. aWith/without other BCTs