Skip to main content

Table 1 Cohesion parameters of the six networks evaluated

From: Examining the effect of the individual characteristics of implementers and the interaction of multiple relationships on the structure of psychosocial intervention teams

Type of relationship

Network cohesion measures

Density

Ind. Cent.

Out. Cent.

Mean degree

Trans.

Number of clusters and model adjustment

Homophily (professional category)

Homophily (based on seniority)

Recognition

51.17%

28.6%

49.8%

25.55

36.64%

7 (R2 = .197)

.240

− .141

Preference to work

7.3%

18.1%

24.4%

3.51

7.11%

10 (R2 = .132)

.163

− .132

Information request (submitted)

8.5%

23.2%

23.2%

4.08

7.04%

16 (R2 = .199)

− .091

− .154

Information request (received)

7.14%

11.84%

26.73%

12.41

6.09%

6 (R2 = .074)

− .056

− .116

User referrals (submitted)

1.74%

6.72%

19.48%

3.31

9.57%

7c (R2 = .138)

.171

− .024

User referrals (received)

1.45%

7.03%

13.41%

2.81

5.47%

8 (R2 = .182)

.176

− .031

  1. Ind. Cent. indegree centralization, Out. Cent. outdegree centralization, Trans. transitivity