Skip to main content

Table 1 Cohesion parameters of the six networks evaluated

From: Examining the effect of the individual characteristics of implementers and the interaction of multiple relationships on the structure of psychosocial intervention teams

Type of relationship Network cohesion measures
Density Ind. Cent. Out. Cent. Mean degree Trans. Number of clusters and model adjustment Homophily (professional category) Homophily (based on seniority)
Recognition 51.17% 28.6% 49.8% 25.55 36.64% 7 (R2 = .197) .240 − .141
Preference to work 7.3% 18.1% 24.4% 3.51 7.11% 10 (R2 = .132) .163 − .132
Information request (submitted) 8.5% 23.2% 23.2% 4.08 7.04% 16 (R2 = .199) − .091 − .154
Information request (received) 7.14% 11.84% 26.73% 12.41 6.09% 6 (R2 = .074) − .056 − .116
User referrals (submitted) 1.74% 6.72% 19.48% 3.31 9.57% 7c (R2 = .138) .171 − .024
User referrals (received) 1.45% 7.03% 13.41% 2.81 5.47% 8 (R2 = .182) .176 − .031
  1. Ind. Cent. indegree centralization, Out. Cent. outdegree centralization, Trans. transitivity