Subscale definition and items | Initial model | Final model | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item factor loading | R2 | Item factor loading | R2 | Mean | S.D. | |
Inter-item reliability of entire scale | .93 | .93 | Â | Â | ||
Factor 1. Financial stability | α = .75 | α = .81 | 2.58 | 1.04 | ||
The project is supported by federal, state, or local government funding. | .090 | .008 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Project is funded through non-profit, private, and/or non-governmental sources. | .579 | .335 | .582 | .339 | 1.94 | 1.32 |
Project has a combination of stable (i.e., earmarked) and flexible (i.e., discretionary) funding. | .745 | .555 | .748 | .559 | 2.40 | 1.34 |
Project has sustained funding. | .758 | .575 | .754 | .569 | 2.69 | 1.37 |
Diverse community organizations are financially invested in the success of the project. | .720 | .519 | .724 | .524 | 2.77 | 1.45 |
Project is financially solvent. | .585 | .342 | .581 | .338 | 3.15 | 1.44 |
Factor 2. Responsiveness to community needs and values | α = .60 |  |  |  | ||
Factor 2a. Responsiveness to community needs |  |  | α = .70 | 4.47 | 0.64 | |
Project meets the needs of the intended target populations. | .548 | .300 | .871 | .758 | 4.56 | 0.68 |
Project addresses the behavioral health needs of the communities/populations being served. | .460 | .212 | .557 | .310 | 4.38 | 0.78 |
Factor 2b. Responsiveness to community values |  |  | α = .70 | 4.72 | 0.42 | |
Project can be adapted to meet the needs of the communities or populations being served. | .489 | .239 | .437 | .191 | 4.61 | 0.60 |
Project is consistent with the norms, values, and guiding principles of participating organizations. | .683 | .467 | .761 | .580 | 4.81 | 0.44 |
Project fits well with the values of the organization(s) responsible for sustaining it and the communities where it is being sustained. | .756 | .572 | .875 | .766 | 4.73 | 0.54 |
Participating organizations have a shared perception of the importance of the project. | .382 | .146 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
The current social or health issue addressed by the project is perceived as intolerable or unacceptable to the community. | .144 | .021 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Factor 3. Coalitions, partnerships, and networks | α = .92 | α = .93 | 4.11 | 0.82 | ||
Grantee organization is networked with other organizations committed to sustaining the project. | .504 | .254 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Community members are passionately committed to sustaining the project. | .675 | .455 | .691 | .477 | 4.09 | 0.92 |
Community is actively engaged in the development of project goals. | .699 | .489 | .723 | .522 | 3.87 | 1.03 |
Community has access to knowledge and information about the project. | .688 | .473 | .710 | .504 | 4.20 | 0.93 |
Project is supported by a coalition/partnership/network of community organizations. | .825 | .681 | .827 | .684 | 4.32 | 1.00 |
Coalition/partnership/network members actively seek to expand the network of community organizations, leaders, and sources of support for this project. | .862 | .744 | .855 | .732 | 4.05 | 1.08 |
Coalition/partnership/network is committed to the continued operation of this project. | .880 | .774 | .858 | .736 | 4.18 | 1.05 |
High level of networking and communication within the organizations responsible for sustaining the project. | .835 | .697 | .829 | .687 | 4.10 | 1.04 |
Community leaders are actively involved in the project. | Â | Â | .750 | .562 | 3.97 | 0.98 |
Factor 4. Infrastructure, capacity and support | α = .88 |  |  |  | ||
Available resources dedicated for implementing and sustaining the project. | .549 | .301 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Project has adequate staff to sustain the program’s goals and activities. | .630 | .397 |  |  |  |  |
Factor 4a. Organizational capacity |  |  | α = .85 | 3.76 | 0.95 | |
Project exhibits sound fiscal management. | .657 | .432 | .645 | .416 | 4.52 | 0.85 |
Project is well integrated into the operations of the organization and its partners. | .794 | .631 | .806 | .650 | 4.25 | 0.86 |
Plans for implementing and sustaining the project are developed in advance. | .684 | .468 | .770 | .593 | 3.95 | 0.96 |
Project is carried out or accomplished according to those plans. | .748 | .560 | .829 | .688 | 4.19 | 0.92 |
Factor 4b. Organizational staff capability |  |  | α = .82 | 4.56 | 0.68 | |
Project offers sufficient training to agency staff and community members. | .635 | .404 | .747 | .558 | 4.34 | 0.93 |
Staff possesses adequate knowledge and supportive beliefs about the project. | .704 | .496 | .884 | .781 | 4.70 | 0.71 |
Staff feel themselves to be capable of implementing the project. | .646 | .417 | .766 | .587 | 4.63 | 0.71 |
Factor 5. Implementation leadership | α = .79 | α = .74 | 4.06 | 0.83 | ||
Leaders in the organization or coalition/partnership/network are actively engaged in the process of implementing and sustaining the project. | .671 | .451 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Community leaders are actively involved in the project. | .729 | .532 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
The project has a formally appointed person responsible for coordinating the process of implementing and sustaining the project. | .661 | .437 | .662 | .439 | 4.52 | 4.09 |
The project is also supported by a champion who is actively engaged in the process of implementing and sustaining the project. | .660 | .435 | .783 | .613 | 4.09 | 0.96 |
We have a process in place to sustain the project in the event our champion leaves. | .623 | .388 | .711 | .506 | 3.56 | 1.15 |
Factor 6. Evaluation, feedback, and program outcomes | α = .74 | α = .75 | 4.08 | 0.78 | ||
Ongoing evaluation of progress made towards sustainment. | .654 | .428 | .656 | .431 | 3.95 | 1.06 |
Sufficient and timely feedback about the project delivery to maintain or improve quality. | .843 | .711 | .832 | .692 | 4.11 | 1.00 |
Evidence of positive outcomes | .559 | .312 | .568 | .322 | 4.17 | 0.79 |
Factor 7. Sustainment outcomes | α = .84 | α = .85 | 4.41 | 0.74 | ||
Continue to operate as described in original application | .608 | .370 | .608 | .370 | 4.36 | 0.82 |
Continue to deliver preventive services to intended population | .828 | .685 | .834 | .695 | 4.67 | 0.72 |
Continue to deliver evidence-based services | .741 | .548 | .743 | .553 | 4.54 | 0.84 |
Periodically measure fidelity of services delivered | .745 | .554 | .734 | .539 | 4.09 | 1.18 |
Total subscales | 7 | 9 | Â | Â | ||
Total items | 42 | 35 | Â | Â | ||
X2 (d.f.) | 1577.1 (798) | 960.2 (524) | Â | Â | ||
CFI | 0.756 | 0.844 | Â | Â | ||
RMSEA | 0.082 | 0.076 | Â | Â | ||
SRMR | 0.090 | 0.066 | Â | Â |