|
Author
|
Score selection
|
Score comparability
|
Score outcome
|
Conclusion
|
|---|
|
Alexaitis et al. 2014 [27]
| ★★★★ |
-
|
-
|
Poor
|
|
Amato et al. 2006 [28]
|
-
|
-
| ★ |
Poor
|
|
Andersen et al. 2017 [29]
| ★★ |
-
| ★ |
Poor
|
|
Davis et al. 2008 [30]
| ★★★ |
-
| ★ |
Poor
|
|
Eskandaria et al. 2018 [31]
| ★★ | ★ |
-
|
Poor
|
|
Hevener et al. 2016 [32]
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Poor
|
|
Link et al. 2016 [33]
| ★★★★ |
-
|
-
|
Poor
|
|
McCue et al. 2004 [34]
| ★ |
-
| ★★ |
Poor
|
|
Mitchell et al. 2018 [9]
|
-
|
-
| ★★ |
Poor
|
|
Sinitsky et al. 2017 [35]
| ★ |
-
| ★ |
Poor
|
|
Thakker et al. 2018 [36]
| ★★★ |
-
| ★ |
Poor
|
|
Weddle et al. 2016 [37]
| ★★ |
-
| ★★★ |
Poor
|
- Poor quality; 0 or 1 star in selection domain OR 0 stars in comparability domain OR 0 or 1 stars in outcome/exposure domain. Fair quality: 2 stars in selection domain AND 1 or 2 stars in comparability domain AND 2 or 3 stars in outcome/exposure domain. Good quality: 3 or 4 stars in selection domain AND 1 or 2 stars in comparability domain AND 2 or 3 stars in outcome/exposure domain [23]
