Table 2 Data collected for process evaluation
Aspects evaluated | Â | Data collection method |
|---|---|---|
1. Blended training: e-learning + interdisciplinary workshops | ||
 Implementation | Who (which HCP) participated in which aspects of the training (e-learning course and workshops) | (Qt) Automatic recording of participation on the e-learning platform—attendance form for workshops |
 Mechanism of impact | Satisfaction (according to levels 1 and 2 of the Kirkpatrick model) | (Qt) Satisfaction survey |
Perceived effect on ICCs (Qt) | (Ql) Multidisciplinary focus groups | |
2. Local interdisciplinary meetings | ||
 Implementation | Number of LIM sessions, number and types of participants, duration, level of consensus reached, etc.) | (Qt) Form filled in by the CP or (head) nurse after each LC |
 Mechanism of impact | Experiences and opinions of participants, satisfaction, perceived benefits (e.g., impact on ICCs, impact on the use of the therapeutic formulary, etc.) | (Ql) Multidisciplinary focus groups |
 Contextual factors | Factors influencing the implementation and the perceived impact of LIMs | (Ql) Multidisciplinary focus groups |
3. Interdisciplinary case conferences | ||
 Implementation | Number of ICCs, number and types of participants, duration, DRPs identified and discussed, etc. | (Qt) Electronic form filled in by the HCPs on the web application after each ICC |
 Mechanism of impact | Experiences and opinions of participants, satisfaction, perceived benefits (e.g., impact on medication use, on NHRs, etc.) | (Ql) Multidisciplinary focus groups |
 Contextual factors | Factors influencing the implementation and the perceived impact of ICCs Views on implementation on a larger scale in Belgium | (Ql) Multidisciplinary focus groups |