Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the action plan contents between the feedback with toolbox (10 ICUs) and feedback only (11 ICUs) group

From: Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care

Action plan contents (all actions)

Feedback with toolbox (n = 153)

Feedback only (n = 81)

p value

 Position in the feedback cycle*

  

0.012

  Verification (e.g. check data accuracy, understand the problem)

9 (5.9)

10 (12.3)

 

  Acceptance (e.g. explore possible solutions)

16 (10.5)

18 (22.2)

 

  Intention (i.e. active effort to change practice)

49 (32.0)

16 (19.8)

 

  Behaviour (i.e. practice change)

79 (51.6)

37 (45.7)

 

 Total number of actions completed

96 (62.7)

51 (63.0)

 

Action plan contents (actions reflecting Intention or Behaviour to change practice)

Feedback with toolbox (n = 128)

Feedback only (n = 53)

p value

 Origin

   

  Selected from the toolbox

104 (81.3)

  

  Self-defined; similar action available in the toolbox

13 (10.2)

32 (60.4)

 

  Self-defined; no similar action available in the toolbox

11 (8.6)

21 (39.6)

 

 Practice domain targeted*

  

0.331

  Guideline

21 (16.4)

6 (11.3)

 

  Individual health professional

50 (39.1)

29 (54.7)

 

  Professional interactions

3 (2.3)

1 (1.9)

 

  Incentives and resources

36 (28.1)

14 (26.4)

 

  Capacity for organisational change

13 (10.2)

3 (5.7)

 

  Patient

5 (3.9)

0 (0.0)

 

 Total number of actions completed

79 (61.7)

37 (69.8)

 

 Median number of actions planned (IQR)

8 (6.25–14.75)

5 (2.5–5)

0.037

 Median number of actions completed (IQR)

4 (2–11)

3 (1–3)

0.142

 Median percentage of actions completed (IQR)

59.2 (37.9–94.1)

60 (20–75)

0.479

 Median average number of days taken to complete actions (IQR)

56.5 (32.6–125.4)

59.8 (44–95.8)

0.762

  1. Values are n (%) of the total number of actions in the study group, except the median (IQR; interquartile ranges) values which summarise at the action plan level (equals ICU level)
  2. *Positions in the feedback cycle reflect one of the sequential feedback processes from CP-FIT [18]; practice domains originate from Flottorp et al.’s checklist for identifying practice determinants [20]