Skip to main content

Table 1 (abstract O43). Stakeholder-driven data collection plan for the implementation study: assessment objectives, data, instruments, timeline and participants

From: Proceedings from the 2nd Annual UK Implementation Science Research Conference, 'Advancing the science of scaling up: Improving efficiency and effectiveness of implementation strategies in healthcare': meeting abstracts

#

Study outcomes

Definition of the study outcome

Data type

Data collection method

Measurement time-point

Stakeholder groups*

IMPLEMENTATION OUTCOMES:

1.

Acceptability [8]

Extent to which programme is perceived to be agreeable and acceptable for hypoglycaemia and diabetes management.

Quantitative

AIM† survey

Post-intervention

HCPs, people with T1D and their relatives

Qualitative

Interview

Post-intervention

2.

Appropriateness [8]

Extent to which programme is perceived to be fit and relevant for hypoglycaemia and diabetes management.

Quantitative

IAM‡ survey

Post-intervention

HCPs, people with T1D and their relatives

Qualitative

Interview

Post-intervention

3.

Feasibility [8]

Extent to which programme can be successfully used or carried out to reduce incidents of severe hypoglycaemia.

Quantitative

FIM§ survey

Post-intervention

HCPs, people with T1D and their relatives

Qualitative

Interview

Post-intervention

4.

Fidelity of delivery [8]

Extent to which programme is delivered as intended.

Quantitative

Checklist

Post-intervention

Diabetes educators and psychologists

5.

Fidelity of receipt [8]

Extent to which programme is received as intended.

Qualitative

Interview

Post-intervention

People with T1D

6.

Adoption [8]

Intention to adopt and use the knowledge and skills learned in the programme in everyday hypoglycaemia and diabetes management.

Qualitative

Interview

Post-intervention

HCPs, people with T1D and their relatives

7.

Sustainability [8,12]

Facilitators and barriers to sustained use of the programme.

Qualitative

Interview

Post-intervention

HCPs, people with T1D and their relatives

8.

Implementation costs [8,12]

Costs associated with prospective implementation of the programme.

Qualitative

Interview

Post-intervention

HCPs, people with T1D and their relatives

OTHER OUTCOMES:

9.

Unintended consequences of programmes [9]

Positive or negative consequences that are not anticipated at the time of programme implementation.

Qualitative

Interview

Post-intervention

HCPs, people with T1D and their relatives

10.

Contextual factors [9]

Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the programme.

Qualitative

Interview

Post-intervention

HCPs, people with T1D and their relatives

11.

Implementation strategies [11]

Strategies used to deliver and implement the programme; they refer to methods or techniques to enhance and promote adoption, implementation and sustainability of the programme.

Qualitative

Interview

Post-intervention

HCPs

  1. Note. *HCPs = Health Care Professionals incl. diabetes educator, physician, psychologist, and administrative support. †AIM = Acceptability of Intervention Measure [12]; ‡IAM = Intervention Appropriateness Measure [12]; §FIM = Feasibility of Intervention Measure [12]