|
Structure and content
|
|
The ImpRes tool is easy to understand
|
4 (3–4)
|
|
The ImpRes tool is time consuming to complete
|
4 (3–4)
|
|
The ImpRes tool is too long
|
3 (2–4)
|
|
The order of the questions is logical
|
4 (4–4)
|
|
The ImpRes tool covers the key components that should be considered when designing/conducting an implementation project
|
4 (4–4)
|
|
Usefulness
|
|
The ImpRes tool is a useful for self/project team reflection regarding implementation research
|
5 (4–5)
|
|
The ImpRes tool is useful for identifying project areas where implementation science is lacking
|
5 (4–5)
|
|
ImpRes is a useful tool to strengthen implementation science in projects
|
5 (4–5)
|
|
Giving project teams feedback on their project based on the ImpRes tool would be useful for improving the quality of implementation research
|
4 (4–5)
|
|
ImpRes is a useful tool to audit the quality of implementation research
|
4 (4–4)
|
|
ImpRes is a useful tool in identifying projects that should be adopted by CLAHRC South Londona, N = 12b
|
4 (3–5)
|
