Advertisement
Table 4 Evaluation of the ImpRes tool
| Statements | Median (IQR) |
|---|---|
| Structure and content | |
| The ImpRes tool is easy to understand | 4 (3–4) |
| The ImpRes tool is time consuming to complete | 4 (3–4) |
| The ImpRes tool is too long | 3 (2–4) |
| The order of the questions is logical | 4 (4–4) |
| The ImpRes tool covers the key components that should be considered when designing/conducting an implementation project | 4 (4–4) |
| Usefulness | |
| The ImpRes tool is a useful for self/project team reflection regarding implementation research | 5 (4–5) |
| The ImpRes tool is useful for identifying project areas where implementation science is lacking | 5 (4–5) |
| ImpRes is a useful tool to strengthen implementation science in projects | 5 (4–5) |
| Giving project teams feedback on their project based on the ImpRes tool would be useful for improving the quality of implementation research | 4 (4–5) |
| ImpRes is a useful tool to audit the quality of implementation research | 4 (4–4) |
| ImpRes is a useful tool in identifying projects that should be adopted by CLAHRC South Londona, N = 12b | 4 (3–5) |
