Audit and feedback report
|
Hospital/institution
|
Audit report summarized the key performance indicators of hospital in comparison to other hospitals in the cohort and all the hospitals participating in the ACS QUIK trial.
|
Formative work identified lack of systems to track quality of care indicators
|
We hypothesize that monthly review of audit report stimulates clinical team to set goals to make changes that will improve processes and clinical outcomes.
|
Clinical team used evidence provided in the audit report for 50–85% of their patients but quality improvement meetings were rare and changes in clinical practice based on these data were not identified.
|
Observed
|
Admission and discharge checklists
|
Physician, nurse
|
Admission and discharge checklists incorporated evidence-based guideline recommended treatment for acute myocardial infraction care at admission and discharge.
|
To minimize variability in practice across hospitals and promote checklists to embed evidence in decision-making
|
Checklists enhance prescription of evidence-based treatment in-hospital and at discharge.
|
Overall improved prescription of aspirin, beta-blocker and statins at discharge.
|
Observed
|
Patient education materials
|
Patient
|
Patient education materials were developed with a focus on tobacco cessation, diet, exercise and cardiac rehabilitation post-acute myocardial infarction.
|
Lack of tobacco cessation counseling, heart-healthy diet and exercise information for patients with acute myocardial infarction
|
Patient education sped-up recovery post-event and reduce the risk of recurrent event.
|
Education material may have enhanced patient self-care post-acute myocardial infarction.
|
Implied
|
Guidelines to develop rapid response and code blue team
|
Hospital/institutional
|
Guidelines and relevant training were provided to the team to establish rapid response and code teams.
|
Absence of rapid response and code team in most settings
|
Development of rapid response and code team facilitated clinical team to do their work more efficiently and are therefore valued.
|
Evidence will be considered more systematically across departments when policy is developed and implemented.
|
Anticipated
|