From: T-CaST: an implementation theory comparison and selection tool
Number | Criteria | Clarity | Importance | Quadrant |
---|---|---|---|---|
Familiarity | ||||
 22 | Personal experience | 2.7 | 2.86 | II |
 21 | Uniqueness | 2.61 | 2.59 | III |
 4 | Approval | 2.68 | 2.97 | II |
 8 | Disciplinary origins | 2.32 | 2.43 | III |
Usability | ||||
 15 | Inclusion of change strategies/techniques | 2.78 | 4 | I |
 18 | Process guidance | 2.81 | 3.59 | II |
 14 | Inclusion of a diagrammatic representation | 2.89 | 3.73 | I |
 19 | Simplicity/parsimony | 2.68 | 3.11 | II |
 3 | Description of a change process | 2.83 | 4.27 | I |
 6 | Accessibility | 2.81 | 4 | I |
Testability | ||||
 5 | Degree of specificity | 2.3 | 3.81 | IV |
 20 | Specificity of a causal relationship among constructs | 2.78 | 4.16 | I |
 11 | Falsifiability | 2.67 | 4.3 | I |
 10 | Explanatory power/testability | 2.81 | 4.46 | I |
 12 | Fecundity | 2.27 | 3.59 | III |
 16 | Logical consistency/plausibility | 2.68 | 4.19 | I |
 9 | Empirical support | 2.62 | 4.08 | IV |
Applicability | ||||
 17 | Outcome of interest | 2.14 | 3.59 | III |
 7 | Associated research method | 2.41 | 3.27 | III |
 1 | Analytic level | 2.65 | 4.32 | I |
 2 | Application to a specific setting | 2.81 | 3.35 | II |
 13 | Generalizability | 2.92 | 3.86 | I |