Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Managerial leadership for research use in nursing and allied health care professions: a systematic review

First author, year, journal

Design

Sample/subjects*

Setting/country

Type of research use (DV measured by)

Manager level

Leadership measured by

Bivariate

• Test statistic

Magnitude (if significant)

Multivariate

• Test statistic

Magnitude (if significant)

Leadership behaviors studied

Quality assessment (weaknesses)

Quantitative studies (n = 9)

 1. Ball 2010 [42]

Association of perioperative Nursing (AORN)

Cross-sectional survey

N = 777

Nurses

Hospital

USA

Level of compliance with research-based guideline recommendations for smoke evacuation practices for 8 surgical procedures in an operating room

Senior

Three items from a survey developed for the study:

Support for clinical practices1

Support for smoke evacuation practices1

Support for policies and procedures1

ANOVA

F (2609) = 4.423

p = .012

+ (magnitude not reported)

F (2585) = 11.043

p < .001

+ (magnitude not reported)

F (2584) = 10.481

p < .001

+ (magnitude not reported)

 

• Support the change

• Embed practices in policy

High moderate

-Self report

-Management of missing data not reported

-Response rate < 50%

 2. Boström 2007 [43]

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Nursing

Cross-sectional survey

N = 132

Nurses

Allied Healthcare Aides

Community

Sweden

Single item from Research Utilization Questionnaire - ‘I use research findings in my daily practice’ scored on a 5-point Likert scale2

Sample divided into 2 groups: research users and non-research users

Point-of-care

One item from the Research Utilization Questionnaire:

Support from unit manager2

Chi square (χ2 = 22.194)*

p < 0.001

+  50% more in research group (64 vs. 14%)

*Proportion of nurses in RU group versus non-RU that agree there is leadership support

Logistic regression

OR = 4.03; 95% CI = 1.04–15.71 (controlling for access to research findings; challenge, support from colleagues, trust, risk-taking)

• Support the change

High moderate

-Self report

-Dependent variable reliably and validly not reported

 3. Boström 2009 [44]

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Cross-sectional survey

N = 210

Nurses

Community

Sweden

Nine item index for ‘research use in daily practice’ from the Research Utilization Questionnaire

Point-of-care

One item from the Research Utilization Questionnaire:

Support from unit manager2

Unadjusted logistic regression

NS

 

• Support the change

High moderate

-Self report

-Dependent variable validity not reported

-Missing data management not reported

 4. Bostrom 2013 [45]

BMC Health Services Research

Cross-Sectional Survey

N = 1256

Nurses

Hospital, primary care, care of older people, psychiatric care

Sweden

Single item - Participate in implementing research-based knowledge in practice3

Responses were dichotomized as high or low (high extent = scores of 3 and 4; low extent = scores of 1 and 2).

Point-of-care

Score of 6 items from the QPS Nordic scale reflecting:

Social support;

Empowering leadership;

Fair leadership3

 

Logistic Regression

High- versus low-quality leadership on high versus low extent of implementation

p < 0.005

+ OR = 2.0 (CI = 1.4; 2.8)

• Support the change

• Encourage

• Distribute work fairly

High moderate

-Self report

-Sample size not justified

 5. Cummings 2018 [50]

Cross-sectional survey (data collected at the end of a cross-over study)

N = 333

Nurses

Managers

Healthcare Aids

Nursing homes

Canada

Single item for instrumental research use (scoring not stated)

Point-of-care

Score of 11-items from manager support

Scale

Score of 5-items from coaching conversation scale

 

Structural equation model (SEM): model chi square (X2)

Manager support: NS

Coaching conversations: NS

• Support the change

• Communicate with staff

High moderate

-Probability sampling not used

-Sample size not justified

-Self report

 6. Estabrooks 2009 [46]

BMC Health Services Research

Cross-sectional survey

N = 764

Nurses

Hospital

Canada

Single item for instrumental research use scored on 5-point frequency scales from ‘10% or less of the time’ to ‘almost 100% of the time’.

Point-of-care

Score of 6 items from the Alberta Context Tool reflecting emotionally intelligent leadership4

Pearson’s correlation (r = 0.098)

p < .05

+ (0.098)

ANOVA to assess changes in mean value of leadership score with increasing RU scores (test statistic not reported)

NS

 

• Emotionally intelligent leadership behaviors

Strong

-Self report

-Response rate < 50%

 7. Forberg 2014 [47]

Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

Cross-sectional survey

N = 639

Nurses

Hospital

Sweden

Adherence to 3 research-based practices. Scoring was dichotomized for each practice as ‘always’ versus ‘not always’ (represents response alternatives never, rarely, occasionally, frequently)

Point-of-care

Score of 6 items from the Alberta Context Tool reflecting

Emotionally intelligent leadership4

Logistical regression

1. Disinfection of hands

NS

2. Disposable gloves

NS

3. Daily inspection

NS

Logistic regression

1. Disinfection of hands: NS

• Emotionally intelligent leadership behaviors

Low moderate

-Management of missing data not reported

-Self report

-Sample size not justified

-Probability sampling not used

 8. Squires 2013 [48]

BMC Health Services Research

Cross-sectional survey

N = 735

Nurses

Hospital

Canada

Single item for instrumental research use scored on 5-point frequency

Scales from ‘10% or less of the time’ to ‘almost 100% of the time’.

Point-of-care

Score of 6-items from the Alberta Context Tool reflecting emotionally intelligent leadership4

 

Generalized estimating equations (GEE)

Estimate: NS

• Emotionally intelligent leadership behaviors

Strong

-Self report

-Response rate < 50%

 9. Yamada 2017 [49]

BMC Health Service Research

Cross-sectional survey

779

Nurses

Hospital

Canada

Single item for instrumental research use scored on 5-point frequency scale from 1 = never use to 5 = almost always use

Point-of-care

Score of 6 items from the Alberta Context Tool reflecting emotionally intelligent leadership4

Binomial distribution and logit link (analogous to logistical regression)

Pain assessment: NS

Pain management: NS

Generalized estimating equations (GEE)

Estimate: chi square (x2)

Pain intensity: x2 = 7.03; p = 0.008

• Emotionally intelligent leadership behaviors

Low moderate

-Probability sampling not used

-Sample size not justified

-Self report

-Response rate < 50%

-Management of missing data not reported

Mixed methods (n = 3)

Balbale 2015 [51]

Implementation Science

Mixed methods

Cross-sectional survey and qualitative

N = 295 survey

N = 30 interviews

Nurses, allied therapists, physicians, physician assistants

Nursing home

USA

Summary score of level of guideline-based practice—facilities categorized as fully implemented or not fully implemented

Senior

3 items from survey developed for the study:

1) Provided adequate staff resources to implement

2) Provided adequate training to implement

3) Provided adequate funding resources to implement

Chi square

(x2 value not reported)

p = .0004

84–62% (fully - not fully implemented)

p = .0042

82–64% (fully - not fully implemented)

p = .0008

70–43%

(fully - not fully implemented)

 

• Provide resources

• Support learning activities

Weak (quant)

-Probability sampling not used

-Sample size not justified

-Response rate < 50%

-Self report

-Dependent variable reliably and validly not reported

-Management of missing data not reported

Strong (qual)

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

-Research design not justified

Gifford 2012 [31]

Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

Mixed methods

Experimental pilot and qualitative

N = 88

N = 26 interviews

Nurses facilitators managers

Community

Canada

Documentation of 5 guideline-based practices for diabetic foot ulcers

Point-of-care

3-month leadership intervention consisting of priority setting and planning

Interviews

Chi square

(x2 value not reported)

p = 0.015

Higher mean number of research based practices in experimental group than control (1.74 vs 2.44)

 

• Build coalitions

• Support the change

• Communicate with staff

• Encourage

• Monitor indicators

• Provide resources

• Support learning activities

• Plan

High moderate (quant)

-Sample size not justified

-Post-test only

-Dependent variable reliably and validly not reported

-Management of missing data not reported

Strong (qual)

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

Rangachari 2015 [52]

Health Care Management Review

Mixed method

Quasi-experimental

Chart audit and qualitative text

N = 107

Nurses Managers Physicians

Hospital

USA

Catheter certification rate = total number of central catheter insertions observed and certified as adhering to components of the guideline-based central line bundle (CLB)

Point-of-care

52-week communication by managers to promote implementation

Statistical tests or p value not provided.

Changes over time evaluated using difference-in-proportions tests.

Catheter certification rate increased 66 to 100% in one unit; 76–100% in the other unit

 

• Communicate with staff

High moderate (quant)

-Probability sampling not used

-Sample size not justified

-Dependent variable reliably and validly not reported

-No comparison strategy

Strong (qual)

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

Qualitative studies (n = 19 studies/22 articles)

1. Angus 2003 [53]

Nursing Inquiry

Qualitative

N = 61

Nurses Managers

Hospitals

Canada

Research-based practice

Point-of-care

Interviews

  

• Build coalitions

• Support the change

• Support learning activities

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

-Ethical issues not mentioned

2. Cheng 2017 [63]

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Qualitative

N = 56

Nurses

Managers Senior leaders Physician

Hospitals

China

Evidence-based practice

Point-of-care and senior

Interviews

  

• Align with organisational mission/vision

• Build coalitions

• Participate in planning

• Support the change

• Encourage

• Enforce/embed practice in policy

• Monitor indicators

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

Cheng 2018 [64]

journal of nursing management

Qualitative Secondary analysis

N = 15

Nurses Managers

Hospitals

China

Evidence-based practice

Point-of-care and senior

Interviews

  

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

3. Chimeddamba 2015 [65]

Implementation Science

Qualitative

N = 40

Nurses

Managers

Physician

Family health centres

Mongolia

Guideline use

Point-of-care

Interviews

  

• Align with organisational mission/vision

• Build coalitions

• Participate in planning

• Monitor indicators

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

-Research design not justified

4. Fleiszer 2016 [54]

International Journal of Nursing Studies

Qualitative

N = 39

Nurses

Facilitators Managers

Hospitals

Canada

Guideline use

Point-of-care

Interviews

  

• Align with organisational mission/vision

• Participate in planning

• Support the change

• Communicate with staff

• Monitor indicators

• Support learning activities

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

Fleiszer_2 2016 [66]

Journal of Nursing Management

Qualitative

N = 39

Nurses

Facilitators Managers

Hospitals

Canada

Guideline use

Point-of-care

Interviews

Observations Document reviews

  

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

5. Gifford (2006) [55]

Nursing Leadership

Qualitative

N = 17

Nurses

Facilitators Managers

Senior leaders

Hospitals

Nursing home

Canada

Guideline use

Point-of-care and senior

Interviews

  

• Align with organisational mission/vision

• Build coalitions

• Support the change

• Communicate with staff

• Encourage

• Monitor indicators

• Support learning activities

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

6. Graham 2004 [56]

Birth

Qualitative

N = 59

Nurses

Facilitators Managers

Senior leaders

Hospitals

Canada

Guideline use

Point-of-care and senior

Interviews

  

• Support the change

• Embed practice in policy

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

7. Herbert 2017 [67]

BMC Health Services Research

Qualitative

N = 26

Nurses Facilitators Managers

Allied Health

Hospital

England

Evidence-based practice

Senior

Interviews

  

• Support the change

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

8. Higuchi 2017 [68]

Journal of Wiley Clinical Nursing

Qualitative

N = 132

Nurses

Facilitators

Managers

Senior leaders

Healthcare aid

Physician

Other providers

Hospitals, long-term care, community health agencies, community health centre

Canada

Guideline use

Senior

Interviews focus groups

  

• Support the change

• Build coalitions

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

9. Ireland 2013 [57]

Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

Qualitative

N = 95

Nurses

Allied Health

Hospitals

Canada

Guideline use

Point-of-care

Interviews

focus groups

  

• Support the change

• Participate in planning

• Monitor indicators

Strong

     

Senior

   

• Support the change

• Build coalitions

10. Kueny 2015 [69]

Journal of Healthcare Leadership

Qualitative

N = 9

Nurses

Managers

Hospitals

USA

Evidence-based practice

Point-of-care

Interviews

  

• Align with organisational mission/vision

• Build coalitions

• Participate in planning

• Communicate with staff

• Encourage

• Support learning

• Activities

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

Senior

   

Communicate with staff

11. Matthew-Maich 2012 [59]

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Qualitative

N = 112

Clients

Nurses Facilitators Managers Senior leaders

Physicians Midwives

Hospital

Canada

Guideline use

Point-of-care

Interviews

  

• Build coalitions

• Support the change

• Encourage

• Embed in policy

• Support learning activities

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

Matthew-Maich 2013 [58]

Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

Qualitative

N = 112

Clients

Nurses Facilitators Managers Senior leaders

Physicians Midwives

Hospital

Canada

Guideline use

Point-of-care

Interviews

  

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

     

Senior

   

• Support the change

12. Munce 2017 [70]

Health Services Research

Qualitative

•N = 33

Nurses, Managers

Allied Health

Rehabilitation centres

Canada

Guideline use

Point-of-care

Telephone focus groups

  

• Build coalitions

• Support the change

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

13. Ploeg 2007 [60]

Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

Qualitative

N = 125

Nurses, Facilitators Managers

Senior leaders

Allied Health

Hospitals

Community

Nursing Home

Canada

Guideline use

Point-of-care and Senior

Interviews

  

• Align with organisational mission/vision

• Participate in planning

• Support the change

• Communicate with staff

• Encourage

• Embed practice in policy

• Provide resources

• Support learning activities

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

14. Raijmakers 2015 [71]

BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care

Qualitative

N = 28

Nurses Managers Physicians

Nursing homes and home care organisations

Netherlands

Evidence-based practice

Point-of-care

Interviews and focus group

  

• Support the change

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

15. Spyridonidis 2016 [72]

British Journal of Management,

Qualitative

N = 46

Nurses

Managers

Physician

Hospitals

UK

Guideline use

Point-of-care

Interviews

  

• Build coalitions

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

-Unclear if ethical approval was sought

16. Stetler 2014 [5]

Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

Qualitative

N = 95

Nurses

Managers

Hospitals

USA

Evidence-based practice

Point-of-care

Interviews and focus groups

  

• Support the change

• Communicate with staff

• Encourage

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

-Number of participants not clear

Senior

   

• Align with organisational mission/vision

• Participate in planning

• Support learning activities

17. Sving 2017 [73]

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Qualitative

N = 36

Nurses

Managers

Hospital

Sweden

Evidence-based practice

Point-of-care

Interviews and focus groups

  

• Support the change

• Communicate with staff

• Provide resources

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

18. Van der Zijpp 2016 [61]

Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

Qualitative

N = 127

Nurses

Facilitators Managers

Long-term care

England, Netherlands, Republic of Ireland, Sweden

Guideline use

Senior

Interviews

  

• Align with organisational mission/vision

• Support the change

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

-Recruitment strategy not clear

19. Wallin 2005 [62]

International Journal of Nursing Studies

Qualitative

N = 45

Nurses

Hospitals

Sweden

Guideline use

Point-of-care

Interviews

  

• Communicate

Strong

-Relationship between researcher and participants not reported

  1. *Nurses = e.g. registered nurses, licenced practical nurses, point-of-care nurses, staff nurses, nurse practitioner, lactation consultant; facilitators = e.g. educators, advanced practice nurses, professional practice leaders, change team facilitators, project leads; managers = e.g. nurse managers, supervisors; senior leaders = e.g. administrators, directors, chief executive, allied health; professionals = e.g. physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech-language pathology, nutritionist, dietitians, rehabilitation professionals
  2. 1Responses reported as always, sometimes and never
  3. 2Scale: 1-strongly disagree, 2-disagree, 3-do not know, 4-agree and 5-strongly agree
  4. 3Responses ranged from 1-very often or always to 5-seldom or never
  5. 4Scale: 1-strongly disagree, 2-disagree, 3-neither agree or disagree, 4-agree and 5-strongly agree