Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of facilitation ‘dose’ and activities undertaken by type

From: Designing and implementing two facilitation interventions within the ‘Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE)’ study: a qualitative analysis from an external facilitators’ perspective

 

Type A facilitation

Type B facilitation

Intervention period

12 months

24 months

Internal facilitator:

 Initial development programme

3 days

5 days

 Teleconference meetings

12

16

 Funded time to undertake the role

19 days (3 days, development programme; 6 days, teleconferences and personal study; 10 days, implementation and evaluation of guideline recommendation)

43 days (5 days, development programme; 18 days, teleconferences and personal study; 20 days, implementation and evaluation of guideline recommendation)

External facilitator:

 Funded time to undertake the role

16 days per EF

31 days per EF

Type of activities undertaken

• Agreeing improvement goals

• Setting up a local project group

• Awareness raising, e.g. posters about the project

• Audits of continence practice

• Development of new documentation, e.g. continence assessment forms and care plan

• Supporting staff to complete documentation

• Forming a project group of stakeholders

• Values clarification exercise

• Self-administered leadership questionnaire

• 360° feedback from colleagues

• Asking staff to complete Context Assessment Index

• Provision of person-centred care presentations to staff

• Interviewing residents with urinary continence

• Using stakeholder group to identify priorities, agree actions and evaluate progress

• Reviewing practice, revising policies and documentation