Skip to main content

Table 3 Barriers and facilitators to use of systematic reviews

From: Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: what is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study

Responsea

Score (Mdnb (IQRc))

Barriers

 I find the format of systematic reviews makes them difficult to read

4 (4); (1, 7)

 The content of the systematic review does not meet my needs

4 (3); (1, 7)

 I do not have the resources to implement evidence from systematic reviews at work

4 (3); (1, 7)

 I do not have the skills to appraise systematic reviews for their validity

4 (3); (1, 7)

 I do not believe that the outcome reported in a systematic review will actually happen

4 (3); (1, 7)

 I don’t agree with the results of a specific systematic review

3 (3); (1, 7)

 I am not motivated to use the results of a systematic review in my decision making

3 (3); (1, 7)

 I am not familiar with systematic reviews

3 (3); (1, 7)

Facilitators

 The content of most systematic reviews meets my needs

6 (3); (1, 7)

 I have the resources to implement evidence from systematic reviews at work

6 (3); (1, 7)

 I am part of collaborations between researchers & policy makers/health care managers

6 (3); (1, 7)

 I am motivated to use the results of a systematic review in my decision making

6 (1); (1, 7)

 I like the format of systematic reviews

5 (2); (1, 7)

 I do have the skills to appraise systematic reviews for their validity

5 (2); (1, 7)

 I believe that the outcome reported in a systematic review will actually happen

5 (2); (1, 7)

 I am familiar with systematic reviews

5 (1.5); (1, 7)

 I agree with the results of a specific systematic review

4 (4); (1, 7)

  1. aSurvey respondents were asked to indicate the level of impact on a Likert scale where 1 = no impact and 7 = major impact
  2. bMdn = median
  3. cIQR = interquartile range