Skip to main content

Table 2 HPV vaccine recommendation quality (n = 83)

From: Why is announcement training more effective than conversation training for introducing HPV vaccination? A theory-based investigation

 

Pre-training

M (SD)

One-month follow-up

M (SD)

Recommendation quality index

4.9 (1.2)

5.3 (0.7)*

Recommendation quality items

 I start routinely recommending HPV vaccine when patients turn 11 or 12. (timeliness)

4.3 (0.8)

4.6 (0.5)*

 I recommend HPV vaccine more often for adolescents at higher risk for getting HPV. (consistency, reverse coded in quality index)

3.0 (1.3)

3.0 (1.3)

 When I recommend HPV vaccine, I say it is very important. (strength of endorsement)

4.1 (0.8)

4.4 (0.6)*

 When I recommend HPV vaccine, I recommend getting it that day. (urgency)

4.2 (0.7)

4.5 (0.6)*

 I promote HPV vaccination as part of routine adolescent care. (routine care)

4.6 (0.6)

4.7 (0.5)*

 When I recommend HPV vaccine, I emphasize that it can prevent cancer. (cancer prevention)

4.7 (0.5)

4.7 (0.5)

  1. Note. The 5-point response scale ranged from strongly disagree (coded as 1) to strongly agree (5). Table not stratified by trial arm because they largely did not differ
  2. *p < .05