Skip to main content

Table 3 Correspondence between intensive care professionals’ intentions and improvement recommendations before and after receiving feedback

From: Health professionals’ perceptions about their clinical performance and the influence of audit and feedback on their intentions to improve practice: a theory-based study in Dutch intensive care units

 

Intentions corresponding with improvement recommendations

Absolute risk difference

Odds ratio*

(95% CI)

p value

Before feedback

After feedback

All quality indicators (n = 288)

197 (68.4%)

230 (79.9%)

11.5%

2.41 (1.53 to 3.78)

< 0.001

Improvement recommendation

 Good performance (n = 71)

19 (26.7%)

31 (43.7%)

17.0%

3.88 (1.39 to 10.87)

0.010

 Room for improvement and improvement recommended (n = 217)

178 (82.0%)

199 (91.7%)

9.7%

4.36 (1.94 to 9.79)

< 0.001

  1. *Adjusted for clustering with random effects for each individual professional, ICU and quality indicator