Themes | ||
---|---|---|
Professional level | Organisational level | Local system level |
Preferences for evidence | Organisational roles | External pressures |
• Varies by professional group and across health care sectors. | • Limit innovations where evidence lacking, assess finance and budgetary issues, and enable stakeholder involvement. | • Influenced how evidence was used in decision-making. |
Professional interests | Organisational facilitators | Pan-regional organisations |
• Influence professional groups’ preferences for innovations and responses to evidence. | • Being ‘data-driven’, well informed to take risks, strong leadership and structures for stakeholder involvement. | • Downward influence on evidence use in local decision-making. |
• Upward relationship whereby pan-regional organisations legitimised innovations/encourage disinvestment at organisational level | ||
Power dynamics | Organisational barriers | Widening stakeholder involvement: |
• Choice of evidence, its interpretation and use in adoption decisions negotiated. | • Time, resources and pressures; authority to implement change; centralised approach to decision-making. | • External networks enable wider range of potential stakeholders to inform decision-making. |
 | Organisational politics |  |
• Shapes selection and interpretation of evidence. |