Skip to main content

Table 5 Guideline characteristics within GI tool categories

From: Number and type of guideline implementation tools varies by guideline, clinical condition, country of origin, and type of developer organization: content analysis of guidelines

Guideline characteristic (n GI tools)

GI tool category (n, %)

Patient

Clinician

Implementation

Evaluation

Overall (464)

113 (24.4)

239 (51.5)

66 (14.2)

46 (9.9)

Condition

 Diabetes

37 (32.7)

64 (26.8)

20 (30.3)

9 (19.6)

 Stroke

26 (23.0)

63 (26.4)

8 (12.1)

3 (6.5)

 Heart failure

15 (13.3)

48 (20.1)

14 (21.2)

11 (23.9)

 Asthma

15 (13.3)

30 (12.6)

4 (6.1)

1 (2.2)

 Arthritis

12 (10.6)

13 (5.4)

6 (9.1)

4 (8.7)

 Depression

5 (4.4)

20 (8.4)

10 (15.2)

7 (15.2)

 Colorectal cancer

3 (2.7)

1 (0.4)

4 (6.1)

11 (23.9)

Country

 United States

62 (54.9)

121 (50.6)

16 (24.2)

0 (0.0)

 United Kingdom

28 (24.8)

38 (15.9)

41 (62.1)

44 (95.7)

 Canada

21 (18.6)

60 (25.1)

8 (12.1)

1 (2.2)

 Australia

1 (0.9)

9 (3.8)

0 (0.0)

1 (2.2)

 International group

1 (0.9)

7 (2.9)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 Singapore

0 (0.0)

2 (0.8)

1 (1.5)

0 (0.0)

 Brazil

0 (0.0)

2 (0.8)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 Finland

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 Spain

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

Organization

 Government agency

39 (34.5)

48 (20.1)

40 (60.6)

39 (84.8)

 Professional society

23 (20.4)

97 (40.6)

13 (19.7)

2 (4.3)

 Disease foundation

18 (15.9)

37 (15.5)

4 (6.1)

4 (8.7)

 Academic institution

29 (25.7)

31 (13.0)

6 (9.1)

0 (0.0)

 Non-profit agency

4 (3.5)

25 (10.5)

3 (4.5)

1 (2.2)

 International group

0 (0.0)

1 (0.4)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

  1. In contrast to Table 4, the proportion of GI tools reflects the total number of GI tools in each category (patient, clinician, implementation, evaluation)