Table 1 Discriminant content validity analysis, NÂ =Â 63
From: Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures
Construct | Item | Median | Wilx | Â |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Acceptability | This EBP seems fine. | .1 | .012 | Â |
| Â | This EBP seems good enough. | 0 | .163 | ns |
| Â | This EBP will do. | .1 | .062 | ns |
| Â | This EBP meets my approval. | .8 | .000 | Â |
| Â | This EBP meets my needs. | .2 | .006 | Â |
| Â | This EBP is okay. | .2 | .005 | Â |
| Â | This EBP is satisfactory. | .6 | .000 | Â |
| Â | I have no objection to this EBP. | .7 | .000 | Â |
| Â | This EBP is pretty good. | 0 | .027 | ns |
| Â | This EBP is appealing. | .7 | .000 | Â |
| Â | I like this EBP. | .8 | .000 | Â |
| Â | I welcome use of this EBP | .8 | .000 | Â |
Appropriateness | This EBP seems right. | 0 | .174 | ns |
| Â | This EBP seems fitting. | .75 | .000 | Â |
| Â | This EBP seems suitable. | .7 | .000 | Â |
|  | This EBP seems reasonable. | − .5 | .000 |  |
| Â | This EBP seems applicable. | .75 | .000 | Â |
| Â | This EBP seems right on the button. | .2 | .050 | ns |
| Â | This EBP seems proper. | .6 | .000 | Â |
| Â | This EBP seems apt. | .7 | .000 | Â |
| Â | This EBP seems like a good match. | .8 | .000 | Â |
| Â | This EBP seems well aligned. | .6 | .000 | Â |
Feasibility | This EBP seems practical. | .25 | .002 | Â |
| Â | This EBP seems realistic. | .6 | .000 | Â |
| Â | This EBP seems workable. | .7 | .000 | Â |
| Â | This EBP seems implementable. | .9 | .000 | Â |
| Â | This EBP seems possible. | .9 | .000 | Â |
| Â | This EBP seems viable. | .35 | .000 | Â |
| Â | This EBP seems doable. | 1 | .000 | Â |
| Â | This EBP seems challenging. | .7 | .000 | Â |
| Â | This EBP seems easy to use. | .9 | .000 | Â |