Skip to main content

Table 1 Discriminant content validity analysis, N = 63

From: Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures

Construct Item Median Wilx  
Acceptability This EBP seems fine. .1 .012  
  This EBP seems good enough. 0 .163 ns
  This EBP will do. .1 .062 ns
  This EBP meets my approval. .8 .000  
  This EBP meets my needs. .2 .006  
  This EBP is okay. .2 .005  
  This EBP is satisfactory. .6 .000  
  I have no objection to this EBP. .7 .000  
  This EBP is pretty good. 0 .027 ns
  This EBP is appealing. .7 .000  
  I like this EBP. .8 .000  
  I welcome use of this EBP .8 .000  
Appropriateness This EBP seems right. 0 .174 ns
  This EBP seems fitting. .75 .000  
  This EBP seems suitable. .7 .000  
  This EBP seems reasonable. − .5 .000  
  This EBP seems applicable. .75 .000  
  This EBP seems right on the button. .2 .050 ns
  This EBP seems proper. .6 .000  
  This EBP seems apt. .7 .000  
  This EBP seems like a good match. .8 .000  
  This EBP seems well aligned. .6 .000  
Feasibility This EBP seems practical. .25 .002  
  This EBP seems realistic. .6 .000  
  This EBP seems workable. .7 .000  
  This EBP seems implementable. .9 .000  
  This EBP seems possible. .9 .000  
  This EBP seems viable. .35 .000  
  This EBP seems doable. 1 .000  
  This EBP seems challenging. .7 .000  
  This EBP seems easy to use. .9 .000  
  1. ns not significant at .05 level after false discovery rate controlling procedure for multiple tests