Table 5 Indirect effect of potential mediators on maternal care outcomes
| Â | Facility based delivery (% change) | Public facility delivery (% change) | Taken at least 2 doses of anti-malaria drug (% change) |
|---|---|---|---|
P4P | |||
 Total effect | 8.2*** | 6.5*** | 10.3*** |
 Standard error | (3.6; 12.8) | (1.3; 11.7) | (4.4; 16.1) |
Indirect effect of P4P on outcome through mediators | |||
Health worker received supervision in last 90 days | |||
 Indirect effect (coefficient interaction) |  |  | 1.5*** |
 Confidence Interval |  |  | (0.1, 3.0) |
 Percentage of total effect explained |  |  | 15 |
 Correlation at which ACME = 0 |  |  | −0.0343 |
Oxytocin injection stock-out | |||
 Indirect effect (coefficient interaction) | 1.8*** | 1.9*** |  |
 Confidence Interval | (0.7, 2.9) | (0.8, 3.1) |  |
 Percentage of total effect explained | 22 | 30 |  |
 Correlation at which ACME = 0 | −0.0439 | −0.0437 |  |
Average kindness (excluding woman herself) | |||
 Indirect effect (coefficient interaction) | 3.9*** | 3.2*** |  |
 Confidence interval | (3.0, 4.7) | (2.4, 3.9) |  |
 Percentage of total effect explained | 48 | 49 |  |
 Correlation at which ACME = 0 | 0.2085 | −0.0202 |  |
Mean of women who paid for delivery (excluding woman herself) | |||
 Indirect effect (coefficient interaction) | 3.9*** | 5.0*** |  |
 Confidence interval | (3.0, 4.8) | (3.9, 6.3) |  |
 Percentage of total effect explained | 48 | 78 |  |
 Correlation at which ACME = 0 | −0.2326 | −0.2590 |  |