Step 1 | Define review question | Step 5 | Create new themes by performing secondary thematic analysis on any evidence that cannot be coded into the a priori framework |
Step 2 | a) Systematically identify relevant primary research studies b) Identify relevant (“best fit”) publications of frameworks and conceptual models/theories | Step 6 | Produce a new framework composed of a priori and new themes supported by the evidence |
Step 3 | Extract data on study characteristics from included studies and conduct study quality appraisal | Step 7 | Revisit evidence to explore relationships between themes or concepts, in order to create a model |
Step 4 | Code evidence from included studies into the a priori framework identified in step 2 |