Skip to main content

Table 1 Implementation evaluation questions, TDF domains and descriptive statistics for the questionnaire items

From: Use of the Theoretical Domains Framework to evaluate factors driving successful implementation of the Accelerated Chest pain Risk Evaluation (ACRE) project

Domain

Question

Means (SDs)

Knowledge

1

I know the objectives of the ACRE project

4.62 (0.52)

2

The evidence that supports the ACRE pathway is strong

4.56 (0.62)

3

I am aware of how the ACRE pathway is used in my hospital

4.69 (0.59)

Skills

4

The skills required to use the ACRE pathway are within the scope of an ED clinician

4.63 (0.58)

5

The ACRE pathway is simple to use

4.45 (0.65)

6

A junior ED doctor would have the capabilities to apply the ACRE pathway to a patient presenting with chest pain

4.16 (0.86)

Social/professional role and identity

7

Use of the ACRE pathway as a clinical decision rule is sound professional practice in the ED

4.35 (0.79)

8

Having both ED and Cardiology specialists leading the ACRE project has helped improve acceptance of the project by local clinicians

4.45 (0.78)

9

Clinicians from departments that manage patients with chest pain support the introduction of the ACRE project

4.21 (0.69)

Beliefs about capabilities

10

It is easy to utilise the ACRE pathway when the ED is busy

4.28 (0.67)

11

The criteria of the ACRE pathway are clear to me

4.56 (0.56)

12

I am confident I could apply the ACRE pathway to risk stratify a patient presenting to ED with chest pain

4.58 (0.53)

Optimism

13

I expect positive outcomes from the ACRE project

4.48 (0.67)

14

I expect ACRE practices to be sustained beyond the completion of the ACRE project

4.46 (0.57)

15

Overall, the ACRE project represents a positive change for Queensland Health

4.66 (0.54)

Beliefs about consequences

16

The ACRE project improves patient flow

4.57 (0.59)

17

The ACRE project has improved management of patients presenting with chest pain

4.43 (0.65)

18

The benefits from outcomes of the ACRE project will outweigh the time and effort required to adopt it

4.56 (0.59)

Intentions

19

I intend to use the ACRE pathway when appropriate to assess patients presenting with chest pain

4.65 (0.53)

20

I intend to promote the education of future staff to utilise the ACRE pathway

4.71 (0.49)

Memory, attention and decision processes

21

Information in my workplace is useful to remind me to use the ACRE pathway

4.30 (0.76)

22

Assessing a patient with chest pain triggers me to use the ACRE pathway

4.40 (0.79)

23

If ACRE pathway letters and referrals are easily accessible I remember to use them

4.27 (0.66)

Environmental context and resources

24

The ACRE pathway is able to be adapted to local processes

4.42 (0.65)

25

There has been sufficient local clinician time allocated to implement the ACRE pathway and processes

3.91 (0.96)

26

There are good networks between parties involved in the adoption of the ACRE project

4.13 (0.85)

27

Support from the ACRE project team has been integral to the successful implementation of the ACRE project

4.40 (0.68)

Social influences

28

Most people whose opinion I value would support the ACRE project

4.37 (0.71)

29

My colleagues are supportive of the ACRE project

4.34 (0.73)

30

Existing staff provide sufficient support to new staff to use the ACRE pathway

4.12 (0.76)