Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of program delivery characteristics and features of adaptability

From: Characterizing implementation strategies using a systems engineering survey and interview tool: a comparison across 10 prevention programs for drug abuse and HIV sexual risk behavior

 

N

Percent

Program delivery characteristics

 Mode of intervention delivery

  Face-to-face contact

11

100 %

  Telephone contact

4

36 %

  Computer/Internet contact

3

27 %

  Video/CD

4

36 %

  Print media

5

46 %

  Lectures

2

18 %

  Technology (computer or telephone)

4

36 %

 Type of intervention strategy

  Provision of social support

5

46 %

  Tracking and monitoring

7

64 %

  Provision of information

10

91 %

  Provision of behavioral incentives

6

55 %

  Didactic instruction

6

55 %

  Skill building techniques

11

100 %

  Problem solving techniques

10

91 %

  Stress management techniques

6

55 %

  Other techniques

5

46 %

 Intervention delivery location

  Participant home

5

46 %

  Classroom

4

36 %

  Physician’s office

.

.

  Hospital/clinic

2

18 %

  Work site

.

.

  Community center

5

46 %

  Nursing home

.

.

  Group residential facility

.

.

  Clinical research space

3

27 %

 Types of materials used

  Information sheets/checklists/pamphlets

7

64 %

  Manuals/workbooks

11

100 %

  Internet

4

36 %

  Video

8

73 %

  Audio

3

27 %

  Live demonstrations

7

64 %

  CDs/DVDs

5

46 %

  Other Materials

1

9 %

Program adaptability features

 Intervention strategies are adapted for cultural sensitivity

11

100 %

 The program is scripted

11

100 %

 Degree of scripting

  Minimal guidelines

1

9 %

  Goals of each session are specified but no further scripting

3

27 %

  Goals and exercises/tasks of each session are specified

6

55 %

  Specific language is provided, with room for elaboration

8

73 %

  Exact scripts are provided for humans to speak

2

18 %

  Intervention is delivered by machine

.

.

  Other

2

18 %

 Aspect of intervention amenable to adaptation

  Number of sessions

4

40 %

  Schedule of sessions

6

60 %

  Duration of sessions

4

40 %

  Location of intervention delivery

4

40 %

  Focus of sessions

3

30 %

  Intervention scripts

1

10 %

 Determination of modifications

  Clinical judgment

4

36 %

  Formal checklist/interventionist

3

27 %

  Intervention MOP

3

27 %

  Participant choice

3

27 %

  Computerized algorithm

.

.

  Other determination

5

46 %

 Time of modifications

  At intake/initial assessment

2

18 %

  At scheduled increments

2

18 %

  At any session/contact

4

36 %

  At other point

4

36 %