Skip to main content

Table 3 TSOS implementation assessments and corresponding RE-AIM framework domains

From: An effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial study protocol targeting posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbidity

Assessment Patient, provider or site assessment How assessed N RE-AIM domain, level
Characteristics of 24 study sites versus all other US sites [35] Site recruitment CONSORT 24/224 Adoption, site
Organizational change, climate and culture surveys [95–102] Trauma center providers Web-based survey 10*24 Implementation, provider
Weekly recruitment log activity [16, 25, 70] PTSD interventionist Recruiting logs 24 Implementation, provider and site
Clinical notes in decision support tool [16] PTSD interventionist Decision support tool 24 Implementation, provider
Patient flow through protocol utilizing trauma registry, recruitment data [16, 25, 70] Patient flow CONSORT 960 Reach, patient
PTSD and comorbidity, gender and ethnicity groups [16, 25, 70] Patient outcomes Telephone interview 960 Effectiveness, patient
EHR, trauma registry, self-report logs [16, 25, 70] Patient outcomes Multiple sources 960 Implementation, patient
>6 months follow-up after intervention [16, 25, 70] Patient 12-month follow-up Phone 960 Maintenance, patient
Semi-structured key informant interviews [121–125] PTSD interventionist Phone 24 Implementation and maintenance, provider and site
National trauma center questionnaire [26, 30] All US level I centers Web 224 Maintenance, site
  1. RE-AIM reach effectiveness adoption implementation maintenance, EHR electronic health record
Back to article page

Implementation Science

ISSN: 1748-5908