Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of intervention strategy implementation

From: Effectiveness of an intervention in increasing the provision of preventive care by community mental health services: a non-randomized, multiple baseline implementation trial

Monthly intervention strategies

Average number who received strategy per montha

 

Group 1b

Group 2c

Overall

 Practice change support officer contacts

   

  Face-to-face visits (managers)

1.6/3 (53 %)

7.6/10 (76 %)

9.2/13 (71 %)

  Face-to-face visits (clinicians)d

4.8/7 (69 %)

8.7/12 (73 %)

13.4/19 (71 %)

  Fortnightly phone/email support (managers)

1.8/3 (60 %)

8.3/10 (83 %)

10.1/13 (78 %)

 Monitoring and feedback

   

  Performance reports provided (managers)e

1.4/3 (47 %)

7.5/10 (75 %)

8.9/13 (68 %)

  Performance reports discussed with (managers)e

1.0/3 (33 %)

7.2/10 (72 %)

8.2/13 (63 %)

 Practice change resources

   

  Tips and updates sheets provided to clinicians (service)f

3.4/7 (49 %)

9.0/12 (75 %)

12.4/19 (65 %)

  Newsletter provided to clinicians (service)f

4.4/7 (63 %)

9.0/12 (75 %)

13.4/19 (71 %)

One-off intervention strategiesg

Month by which majority of target (80 % ) received strategyh

 

Group 1b

Group 2c

Overall

 Clinician and manager training

   

  Manager training (managers)

5/12

4/12

5/12

  Online training (managers)

n/ai

4/12

5/12

  Online training (clinicians)

7/12

5/12

6/12

 Practice change resources

   

  Provision of resource pack (service)f

4/12

1/12

3/12

  1. aAverage number of targets of the intervention strategy (services or managers) who received each strategy per month
  2. bIncludes 7 services with a total of 3 managers and 52 clinicians
  3. cIncludes 12 services, with a total of 10 managers and 165 clinicians
  4. dRecorded at service level as support officer made available to all clinicians at relevant service
  5. eDue to complications with the software used for performance monitoring and feedback, this strategy was not available for 6/12 months of the intervention period in group 1 and 3/12 months in group 2
  6. fRecorded at service level as resource provided to the service to distribute to individual clinicians
  7. gThe following strategies were implemented across the health district prior to intervention implementation: district wide preventive care policy, key performance indicators (based on consultation with health district executives, senior clinicians and managers), tool incorporated into the electronic medical record, e-mail helpline and an internet resource site
  8. hIntervention month in which the majority of services, managers or clinicians (80 %) had received each ‘one-off’ intervention strategy
  9. i<80 % of managers in group 1 completed the online training modules by the completion of the intervention. By month 5, 2/3 managers had completed the modules. The third manager did not complete the modules by the completion of the intervention