Skip to main content

Table 3 Structural indicators of information-seeking networks in each health unit, at baseline and follow-ups

From: The evolution of social networks through the implementation of evidence-informed decision-making interventions: a longitudinal analysis of three public health units in Canada

 

Unit A

Unit B

Unit C

Size

119

133

49

Density baseline

1.5 %

1.0 %

3.3 %

Density follow-up 1

1.6 %

0.9 %

3.1 %

Density follow-up 2

2.0 %

1.0 %

3.3 %

Reciprocity baseline

12 %

25 %

16 %

Reciprocity follow-up 1

15 %

22 %

24 %

Reciprocity follow-up 2

13 %

17 %

13 %

In-degree centralization baseline

16 %

5 %

20 %

In-degree centralization follow-up 1

12 %

3 %

14 %

In-degree centralization follow-up 2

17 %

6 %

22 %

Krackhardt’s hierarchy baseline

0.93

0.84

0.92

Krackhardt’s hierarchy follow-up 1

0.86

0.83

0.85

Krackhardt’s hierarchy follow-up 2

0.90

0.95

0.89

Normalized group centrality of highly engaged staff-baseline

0.37

0.11

0.44

Normalized group centrality of highly engaged staff follow-up 1

0.45

0.14

0.35

Normalized group centrality of highly engaged staff follow-up 2

0.56

0.10

0.35

Divisions: E-I index baseline

−0.56

−0.60

−0.34

Divisions: E-I index follow-up 1

−0.60

−0.41

−0.46

Divisions: E-I index follow-up 2

−0.56

−0.45

−0.32