Skip to main content

Table 5 Stakeholders targeted by instruments

From: The Society for Implementation Research Collaboration Instrument Review Project: A methodology to promote rigorous evaluation

Domain

Construct

DirectorN(%)

SupervisorN(%)

ProviderN(%)

ConsumerN(%)

OtherN(%)

Implementation outcomes

Acceptability

0 (0.00%)

1 (1.96%)

31 (60.78%)

16 (31.37%)

3 (5.88%)

Adoption

4 (16.67%)

5 (20.83%)

11 (45.83%)

2 (8.33%)

8 (33.33%)

Appropriateness

0 (0.00%)

1 (14.29%)

3 (42.86%)

1 (14.29%)

2 (28.57%)

 

Feasibility

1 (7.14%)

1 (7.14%)

7 (50.00%)

6 (42.86%)

1 (7.14%)

 

Penetration

0 (0.00%)

2 (40.00%)

1 (20.00%)

1 (20.00%)

1 (20.00%)

 

Sustainability

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

4 (44.44%)

2 (22.22%)

3 (33.33%)

Intervention characteristics

Adaptability

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

1 (100%)

1 (100%)

0 (0.00%)

Complexity

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

3 (75.00%)

0 (0.00%)

1 (25.00%)

Design quality and packaging

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

 

Evidence strength and quality

0 (0.00%)

1 (20.00%)

3 (60.00%)

1 (20.00%)

0 (0.00%)

 

Intervention source

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

 

Relative advantage

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

4 (57.14%)

1 (14.29%)

3 (42.86%)

 

Trialability

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

2 (66.67%)

0 (0.00%)

1 (33.33%)

Outer setting

Cosmopolitanism

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

1 (100%)

 

External policy and incentives

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

 

Patient needs and resources

1 (33.33%)

0 (0.00%)

2 (66.67%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

 

Peer pressure

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

Inner setting

Combined

1 (11.11%)

2 (22.22%)

5 (55.55%)

1 (11.11%)

1 (11.11%)

 

Culture

2 (25.00%)

3 (37.50%)

5 (62.50%)

2 (25.00%)

0 (0.00%)

 

Implementation climate

1 (6.67%)

10 (66.67%)

5 (33.33%)

4 (26.67%)

1 (6.67%)

 

  IC: tension for change

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

 

  IC: Compatibility

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

1 (100%)

 

  IC: Relative priority

1 (100%)

1 (100%)

1 (100%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

 

  IC: Organizational incentives and rewards

0 (0.00%)

2 (50.00%)

1 (25.00%)

0 (0.00%)

1 (25.00%)

 

  IC: goals and feedback

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

 

  IC: learning climate

0 (0.00%)

6 (42.86%)

1 (7.14%)

7 (50.00%)

0 (0.00%)

 

Networks and communications

0(0.00%)

3 (25.00%)

4 (33.33%)

6 (50.00%)

0 (0.00%)

 

Readiness for implementation

2 (10.53%)

0 (0.00%)

3 (15.79%)

5 (26.32%)

10 (52.63%)

 

  RI: leadership engagement

1(25.00%)

4 (100%)

2 (50.00%)

1 (25.00%)

0 (0.00%)

 

  RI: available resources

0 (0.00%)

2 (100%)

1 (50.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

 

  RI: access to knowledge and information

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

1 (100%)

 

Structural characteristics

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

1 (50.00%)

0 (0.00%)

1 (50.00%)

Characteristics of individuals

Knowledge and beliefs about the intervention

1 (1.79%)

2 (3.57%)

40 (71.43%)

8 (14.29%)

7 (12.50%)

 

Individual stage of change

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

4 (66.67%)

1 (16.67%)

1 (16.67%)

 

Individual identification with the organization

(0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

5 (83.33%)

1 (16.67%)

 

Other personal attributes

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

8 (21.05%)

18 (47.37%)

12 (31.58%)

 

Self-efficacy

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

2 (50.00%)

1 (25.00%)

1 (25.00%)

Process

Engaging

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

1 (100%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

 

  Engaging: opinion leaders

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

3 (100%)

 

  Engaging: formally appointed internal implementation leaders

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

 

  Engaging: champions

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

 

  Engaging: external change agents

0 (0.00%)

1 (100%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

 

Executing

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

1 (100%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

 

Planning

0 (0.00%)

5 (17.86%)

5 (17.86%)

5 (17.86%)

17 (60.71%)

 

Reflecting and evaluating

0 (0.00%)

2 (10.00%)

9 (45.00%)

1 (5.00%)

10 (50.00%)

Client outcomes

Satisfaction

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

4 (28.57%)

5 (35.71%)

6 (42.86%)

  1. “Other” represents general staff or researchers.