Skip to main content

Table 3 Organizational Social Context scores by agency

From: A complementary marriage of perspectives: understanding organizational social context using mixed methods

Site N Ratio 1 Ratio 2 Prof. Rigidity Resistance Engagement Function. Stress LPA
A 8 .56 .38 52 53 56 57 56 51 Avg
B 8 .75 .25 58 56 56 59 75 55 Best
C 14 .27 .13 46 59 65 49 55 58 Worst
D 8 .71 .38 59 64 57 48 65 53 Avg
E 5 .33 .33 21 65 88 37 19 81 Worst
F 10 .53 .20 59 53 61 61 68 57 Best
G 5 .33 .60 59 44 53 62 62 42 Best
H 5 .15 .40 56 69 59 58 70 55 Avg
I 9 1 .22 53 62 63 64 62 55 Worst
J 15 .48 .25 69 54 75 53 85 46 Best
K 5 .6 .40 54 58 68 58 52 68 Worst
L 9 .73 .11 31 49 53 43 58 54 Avg
M 7 1 .14 41 63 80 43 49 73 Worst
N 8 .71 .44 54 67 73 53 62 59 Worst
O 4 .33 .50 65 66 72 54 71 62 Worst
P 4 .5 .50 56 50 64 57 58 61 Avg
Q 7 1 .14 59 60 64 64 68 48 Best
R 7 .44 .43 58 58 65 48 75 59 Worst
S 4 .57 .20 52 79 78 57 56 63 Worst
T 4 .28 .50 40 60 70 44 42 73 Worst
U 15 .65 .27 64 51 53 57 72 52 Best
V 7 .71 .29 56 53 57 60 70 39 Best
W 8 .33 .33 37 64 78 54 50 61 Worst
Mean 7.65 .56 .32 52.09 58.97 65.48 53.89 60.92 57.51 -
  1. Ratio 1 = number of participants in our study/total number of therapists in child outpatient program, Ratio 2 = number of administrators who completed the Organizational Social Context (OSC) measure/total number of participants who completed the OSC; prof. proficiency, funct. functionality, LPA latent profile analysis.