Peer Review reports
From: Using realist evaluation to open the black box of knowledge translation: a state-of-the-art review
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 Nov 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 1 Feb 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Geetha Ranmuthugala |
| 3 Feb 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marjolein Dieleman |
| 11 Feb 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Purva Abhyankar |
| 25 May 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Katherine Salter |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 25 May 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 2 Jun 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Geetha Ranmuthugala |
| 12 Jun 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Purva Abhyankar |
| 13 Jun 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marjolein Dieleman |
| 10 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Katherine Salter |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 10 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 16 Aug 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Katherine Salter |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 16 Aug 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 21 Aug 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 5 Sep 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/s13012-014-0115-y |
You can find further information about peer review here.