Table 1 Characteristics of retrieved documents

What it covers

Topical/relevant issue from the perspective of policy makers with an explicit process for determining topically/relevance (e.g., priority setting exercise, rapid response service).

35

74

32%

Document explicitly addresses at least four or more of the following: political and/or health system contexts, problem, options, implementation considerations, and cost implications.

67

42

61%

What it includes

Draws on synthesized/assessed research evidence that has been assessed for its local applicability.

39

70

36%

Incorporates the tacit knowledge of policymaker/stakeholders that has been collected in a systematic way and reported in a transparent manner.

20

89

18%

For whom its targeted

Explicitly targets policymakers/stakeholders as the key audience.

72

37

66%

Engages policymakers/stakeholders in merit review.

21

88

19%

How its packaged

Organized to highlight decision relevant information.

72

37

66%

Understandable/lay language used.

87

22

80%

In format that is readily appreciated (e.g., graded entry).

98

11

90%

How use is supported

Contextualized through online commentaries/briefings provided by policymakers/stakeholders.

5

104

5%

Features and content

Equity considerations discussed or implicitly considered, e.g., through topic or analysis.

36

73

33%

Recommendations provided.

47

62

43%

Methods described.

51

58

47%

Quality of research evidence and/ or limitations outlined.

29

80

27%

Reference list provided.

84

25

77%

Local applicability discussed, including case examples to highlight how a particular policy might be adapted to local circumstances.

44

65

40%

Key messages or summary points provided.

63

46

58%