Peer Review reports
From: Guidelines for guideline developers: a systematic review of grading systems for medical tests
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 19 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Gowri Gopalakrishna |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 19 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 4 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Booth |
| 6 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Melissa Brouwers |
| 12 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Don-Wauchope |
| 17 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Regina Kunz |
| 5 Mar 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Gowri Gopalakrishna |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 5 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 3 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Gowri Gopalakrishna |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 3 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 13 May 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Gowri Gopalakrishna |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 13 May 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 13 Jun 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Gowri Gopalakrishna |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 13 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 14 Jun 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 10 Jul 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-78 |
You can find further information about peer review here.