Table 6 Utilities of innovation characteristics
Characteristic | Level | Utility estimate | Std. error | Innovation A | Innovation B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Impact on care | Significant improvement | -0.228 | 0.111 | √ | √ |
Moderate | 0.078 | 0.130 | |||
Limited | 0.150 | 0.130 | |||
Costs | Low | 0.252 | 0.111 | √ | |
Moderate | -0.090 | 0.130 | √ | ||
High | -0.162 | 0.130 | |||
Local health needs | Low prevalence | -0.207 | 0.083 | ||
High prevalence | 0.207 | 0.083 | √ | √ | |
Minimum standards | No, not meeting minimum standards. | -0.324 | 0.083 | √ | |
Yes, meeting minimum standards. | 0.324 | 0.083 | √ | ||
Strength of supporting evidence | No supporting evidence. | -0.243 | 0.144 | ||
Limited supporting evidence. | -0.135 | 0.144 | |||
Moderate supporting evidence. | -0.027 | 0.144 | √ | ||
Strong supporting evidence. | 0.405s | 0.144 | √ | ||
Priority | National priority | -0.108 | 0.111 | √ | |
Local priority | -0.144 | 0.130 | √ | ||
Both local and national priority | 0.252 | 0.130 | |||
Existence of local expertise | No, there is no local expertise. | 0.018 | 0.083 | √ | |
Yes, there is local expertise. | -0.018 | 0.083 | √ | ||
Constant | 0.048 | 0.096 |