Peer Review reports
From: A qualitative analysis of a consensus process to develop quality indicators of injury care
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Stokes |
15 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Leif Solberg |
25 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Shekelle |
25 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nelson SooHoo |
16 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Niklas Bobrovitz |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
18 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Stokes |
21 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Niklas Bobrovitz |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
27 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Niklas Bobrovitz |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
27 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
5 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Niklas Bobrovitz |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
5 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
8 Apr 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Apr 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-45 |
You can find further information about peer review here.