Peer Review reports
From: A qualitative analysis of a consensus process to develop quality indicators of injury care
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 11 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Stokes |
| 15 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Leif Solberg |
| 25 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Shekelle |
| 25 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nelson SooHoo |
| 16 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Niklas Bobrovitz |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 16 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 18 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Stokes |
| 21 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Niklas Bobrovitz |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 21 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 27 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Niklas Bobrovitz |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 27 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 5 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Niklas Bobrovitz |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 5 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 8 Apr 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 18 Apr 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-45 |
You can find further information about peer review here.