Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 14 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amanda Henderson |
| 29 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Justin Presseau |
| 10 May 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Naomi Cahill |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 10 May 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 27 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Justin Presseau |
| 27 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Naomi Cahill |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 27 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 12 Oct 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Naomi Cahill |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 12 Oct 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| 25 Nov 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Naomi Cahill |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| 25 Nov 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
| Publishing | ||
| 26 Nov 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 4 Dec 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-140 |
You can find further information about peer review here.