Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of treatment and standard conditions (w/ non-county actors) with and without CiMH representatives

From: Influence network linkages across implementation strategy conditions in a randomized controlled trial of two strategies for scaling up evidence-based practices in public youth-serving systems

 

With CiMH nodes

Without CiMH nodes

Metric

Control

CDT

Standard

CDT

Size

98

105

96

103

# of steps

77

114

73

103

# of components1

5

1

6

2

Density

0.008

0.0104

0.0081

0.0098

Average distance2

1.368

1.748

1.358

1.769

Out-degree centrality

0.786 (2.508)

1.086 (2.750)

0.771 (2.447)

1.000 (2.558)

Betweenness centrality

0.429 (1.654)

1.667 (7.045)

0.406 (1.545)

1.612 (6.719)

  1. 1Isolates not counted as components.
  2. 2Among reachable pairs.
Back to article page

Implementation Science

ISSN: 1748-5908