Skip to main content

Table 1 Theoretical basis and strategies to address modifiable barriers

From: A KT intervention including the evidence alert system to improve clinician’s evidence-based practice behavior—a cluster randomized controlled trial

Barrier: Lack of confidence/skill searching, appraising and synthesizing research evidence

KT intervention

Underpinning theory or group of theories

Strategy/rationale

Workshop

Problem based learning, learning styles

Workshops used problem based learning approach and a variety of approaches to ensure that different learning styles were catered to, maximizing the likelihood of increased confidence and skill levels

EAS

Cognitive

Accurate, relevant research evidence on cerebral palsy assessment and treatment was provided via the EAS building skill by modeling synthesis and summary of treatment areas. The EAS bypassed the need for high-level appraisal skills.

Mentoring

Educational

AHPs were included in the problem solving process during mentoring sessions and aimed to increase confidence and build skill base.

 

      BARRIER: LACK OF TIME

KT intervention

Group of theories that the intervention relates to

Strategy/rationale

EAS

Cognitive

The provision of accurate, relevant research evidence bypassed the need for extensive time spent searching and appraising research via databases and journals.

Paid EBP time in policy

Reimbursement

Paid, protected time for AHPs to engage in EBP activities was provided

Leadership

Changing policy suggested management ‘buy in’ and endorsement to support changes throughout the organization (leadership theory)

Documentation changes including a reminder system

Total quality management (TQM)

Patient documentation and work processes were reorganized to support clinical decision making and save time (reminder systems, checklists and directing participants to the EAS)

     BARRIER: EVIDENCE CONSIDERED AS NOT CLINICALLY RELEVANT

KT intervention

Group of theories that the intervention relates to

Strategy/rationale

Workshop teaching EAS

Educational

AHPs were involved in the problem solving process, so that they ‘owned’ and were a part of the process and could see the applicability of the EAS. Having the 8 week period in between workshops, allowed independent learning and time to apply the EAS information to a real client

Motivational

Facilitators aimed to convince AHPs of the relevance of research in their area by exploring the EAS through clinical examples and role playing

EAS

Marketing

An appealing product (the EAS) was developed and this was disseminated in a variety of ways (workshop, mentoring, documentation changes)

     BARRIER: NO ACCESS TO FULL ARTICLES AND RESEARCH DATABASES

KT intervention

Group of theories that the intervention relates to

Strategy/rationale

EAS

Organizational learning

All staff members at every level of the organization had access to current cerebral palsy evidence and exchange of information via mentoring sessions and team meetings was promoted

     BARRIER: SOME STAFF WITH NEGATIVE ATTITUDES TOWARDS EBP

KT intervention

Group of theories that the intervention relates to

Strategy/rationale

Workshop

Social

Credible staff facilitated workshops, modeled positive attitudes and

emphasized ‘buy in’ from decision-makers in the organization

Mentoring

Social

Mentors were selected with positive attitudes towards EBP so that target behavior was modeled