Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 3 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Cranley |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 3 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 5 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Heather Menne |
| 25 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Per Nilsen |
| 3 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Cranley |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 3 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 3 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Cranley |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 3 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 19 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Per Nilsen |
| 11 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Cranley |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 11 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 22 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Cranley |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 22 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 6 Sep 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 13 Sep 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-90 |
You can find further information about peer review here.