Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
19 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gavin Daker-White |
9 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Walley |
10 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniella Georgeu |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
10 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
20 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniella Georgeu |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
20 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
31 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniella Georgeu |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
31 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
27 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniella Georgeu |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
27 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
28 Jun 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
16 Jul 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-66 |
You can find further information about peer review here.