Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
12 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Ndyomugyenyi |
27 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Katie Reed |
17 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Caroline Asiimwe |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
17 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
27 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Katie Reed |
31 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Caroline Asiimwe |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
31 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
14 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Caroline Asiimwe |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
14 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
2 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Caroline Asiimwe |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
2 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
18 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Caroline Asiimwe |
Resubmission - Version 11 | ||
18 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 11 |
Publishing | ||
23 Jan 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
23 Jan 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.