Peer Review reports
From: Methods for the guideline-based development of quality indicators--a systematic review
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 16 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jane Young |
| 18 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joze Braspenning |
| 26 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kötter |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 26 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 3 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jane Young |
| 8 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joze Braspenning |
| 9 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kötter |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 7 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kötter |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 7 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 23 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kötter |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 23 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 21 Mar 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 21 Mar 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-21 |
You can find further information about peer review here.