Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
8 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maria Grypdonck |
12 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - kathy murphy |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
19 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Brendan McCormack |
8 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maria Grypdonck |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
19 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
27 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Brendan McCormack |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
27 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
27 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Brendan McCormack |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
27 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 10 | |
27 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Brendan McCormack |
Resubmission - Version 11 | ||
27 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 11 |
Publishing | ||
1 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
1 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-9 |
You can find further information about peer review here.