Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Understanding the relationship between the perceived characteristics of clinical practice guidelines and their uptake: protocol for a realist review

Original Submission
1 Feb 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - RAY PAWSON
24 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Trisha Greenhalgh
12 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Monika Kastner
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Trisha Greenhalgh
17 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Monika Kastner
Resubmission - Version 3
17 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Monika Kastner
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Monika Kastner
Resubmission - Version 5
27 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
4 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Monika Kastner
Resubmission - Version 9
4 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
6 Jul 2011 Editorially accepted
6 Jul 2011 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-6-69

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page